ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanobiology and Molecular Regulation of Periodontal Tissue Remodeling During Orthodontic Tooth Movement: From Periodontal Phenotype to Precision Orthodontics-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Shear bond strength of laser-sintered orthodontic appliances bonded to enamel using various bonding protocols: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Flexural Strength and Radiodensity of Different Barium Sulfate-Containing Polymethyl Methacrylate Provisional Restorative Materials.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A novel classification of periodontal phenotype integrating hard and soft tissue parameters using data-driven clustering.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Accuracy of master casts fabricated for "all on 4" and "all on 6" implant situation in maxillary arch as influenced by the number of digital scan bodies: An in vitro comparative study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- Accuracy and reliability of a three-dimensional superimposition method for maxillary jaws and dentition.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Digital Orthodontic Setups in Orthognathic Surgery: Evaluating Predictability and Precision of the Workflow in Surgical Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Application of a 3D Fusion Model to Evaluate the Efficacy of Clear Aligner Therapy in Malocclusion Patients: Prospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Two experimental methods to integrate intra-oral scans into 3D stereophotogrammetric facial images.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Digital assessment of supracrestal tissue attachment and its correlation with dentogingival components.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2024Article
- Optimizing Orthognathic Surgery: Leveraging the Average Skull as a Dynamic Template for Surgical Simulation and Planning in 30 Patient Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Intra-oral scan segmentation using deep learning.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Synergy between artificial intelligence and precision medicine for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgical planning.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Review
- [Research progress of digital occlusion setup in orthognathic surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Review
- The Impact of Technological Innovation on Dentistry.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- The Prediction Accuracy of Digital Orthodontic Setups for the Orthodontic Phase before Orthognathic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Plaster Casts vs. Intraoral Scans: Do Different Methods of Determining the Final Occlusion Affect the Simulated Outcome in Orthognathic Surgery?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Constructing Digital Hybrid Skull-Dentition Images Using an Intraoral Scanner and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Scanning · 2022Article
- Registration-free workflow for electromagnetic and optical navigation in orbital and craniofacial surgery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Non-Invasive Optical Coherence Tomography Data-Based Quantitative Algorithm for the Assessment of Residual Adhesive on Bracket-Removed Dental Surface.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using two commercially available software packages. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen dry human skulls were subjected to structured light scanning, CBCT scanning, and intra-oral scanning. Two commercially available software packages were used to perform fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT scan to create an accurate virtual head model: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™. The structured light scanner was used as a gold standard and was superimposed on the virtual head models, created by IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, using an Iterative Closest Point algorithm. Differences between the positions of the intra-oral scans obtained with the software packages were recorded and expressed in six degrees of freedom as well as the inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient.
resultsThe tested software packages, IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, showed a high level of accuracy compared to the gold standard. The accuracy was calculated for all six degrees of freedom. It was noticeable that the accuracy in the cranial/caudal direction was the lowest for IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ in both the maxilla and mandible. The inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient showed a high level of agreement between the observers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ are reliable software packages providing an accurate fusion of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT. Both software packages can be used as an accurate fusion tool of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT which provides an accurate basis for 3D virtual planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.