ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Testing Porter and pollution haven hypothesis via economic variables and CO
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Democracy, green energy, trade, and environmental progress in South Asia: Advanced quantile regression perspective.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Will China-Africa trade increase Africa's carbon emissions?PloS one · 2023Article
- Analyzing the impact of energy consumption, the democratic process, and government service delivery on life expectancy: evidence from a global sample.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Dynamic linkages of financial inclusion, modernization, and environmental sustainability in South Asia: a panel data analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Long-run equilibrium relationship between energy consumption and COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- A comparative study on the effect of alternative and fossil energy consumption on economic growth and foreign direct investment in selected countries using SUR approach.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Predictors of carbon emissions: an empirical evidence from NAFTA countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, determining the factors influencing carbon dioxide emissions is a crucial issue for policymakers. So, this study examines Porter and pollution haven's hypothesis via foreign direct investment, financial development, and energy consumption in 14 countries of the MENA region during 2004-2016, using panel quantile regression that estimated the impact of these factors in quantiles of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 0.9. Also, the effect of population, trade openness, and economic growth variables has been investigated as controlling variables on CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
32495198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.