Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495188›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2020

Clinical Validation of a Multi-Biomarker Assay for the Evaluation of Chronic Pain Patients in a Cross-Sectional, Observational Study.

Kasra Amirdelfan, Jason E Pope, Joshua Gunn, Melissa M Hill, Bradley M Cotten, John E Beresh, Douglas Dobecki, Nathan Miller, Pankaj Mehta, George Girardi and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05896878 (The Effects of Daily Anti-inflammatory Supplementation on Foundation Pain Index Scores in Chronic Opiate Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05896878 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Daily Anti-inflammatory Supplementation on Foundation Pain Index Scores in Chronic Opiate Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorHudson MedicalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled1ConditionsPain, Chronic, Opioid Dependence, Opioid Use, Inflammation ChronicArmsRoot.Health Dietary Supplement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kasra AmirdelfanIPM Medical Group, 450 N Wiget Ln, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
Jason E PopeEvolve Restorative Center, 416 Aviation Blvd Ste B, Santa Rosa, CA, 95403, USA.
Joshua GunnEthos Research and Development, LLC, 29 E 6th Street, Newport, KY, 41071, USA. drgunn@ethosrd.com.
Melissa M HillEthos Research and Development, LLC, 29 E 6th Street, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
Bradley M CottenEthos Research and Development, LLC, 29 E 6th Street, Newport, KY, 41071, USA.
John E BereshBeresh Pain Management, Inc, 840 NW Washington Blvd #C, Hamilton, OH, 45013, USA.
Douglas DobeckiSan Diego Pain Institute, 7625 Mesa College Dr Ste 315A, San Diego, CA, 92111, USA.
Nathan MillerCoastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics, 6221 Metropolitan St, Carlsbad, CA, 92009, USA.
Pankaj MehtaPain Specialists of Austin, 2500 W William Cannon Dr Ste 206, Austin, TX, 78745, USA.
George GirardiFront Range Pain Medicine, 3744 S Timberline Rd Ste 102, Fort Collins, CO, 80525, USA.
Timothy R DeerCenter for Pain Relief, 400 Court St Ste 100, Charleston, WV, 25301, USA.
Evolve Restorative Center · USFront Range Engineering (United States) · USMedical Advanced Pain Specialists · USPain Management Institute · USSan Diego Mesa College · USSpinal Diagnostics and Treatment Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pain assessment and post-treatment evaluation continues to be challenging due to a lack of validated, objective tools to measure patient outcomes. Validation of mechanistic pain biomarkers would allow clinicians to objectively identify abnormal biochemistry contributing to painful symptoms.

methodsWe describe the clinical validation of a multi-biomarker assay with algorithmic analysis known as the Foundation Pain Index (FPI) in diverse cohorts of chronic pain patients in a prospective, cross-sectional, observational validation study. Levels of 11 urinary pain biomarkers were measured and tabulated using a proprietary algorithm to generate FPI scores for chronic pain subjects (N = 153) and age- and sex-matched pain-free controls (N = 334).

resultsFPI scores were significantly correlated with the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores among chronic pain subjects (P value < 0.015) and specific components of SF-36, including emotional well-being, limitations due to emotional problems, and general health (P value < 0.05). Area under ROC analysis (AUROC) revealed FPI to accurately distinguish biomarker profiles between pain-free and chronic pain cohorts (AUROC: 0.7490, P value < 0.0001) as well as the SF-36 scores between chronic pain subjects with low vs. high FPI scores (AUROC: 0.7715, P value < 0.01).

conclusionsOur findings establish the validity and discriminatory power of a novel multi-biomarker test that evaluates the role of biochemistry in chronic pain and correlates with clinical assessments of patients. This test provides novel, reproducible, objective data which may pave the way for non-opioid therapeutic strategies to treat chronic pain.

Indexed as

BiomarkerInflammationKynurenineMicronutrientPain

Identifiers

PMID32495188
PMCPMC7648807
OpenAlexW3029108288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.