ArticlePediatric radiology2020
E-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury in the pediatric population: imaging features at presentation and short-term follow-up.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical features, radiological findings, and mortality in patients with e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review of quantitative and functional lung imaging evidence of vaping-related lung injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- E-cigarette vaping associated acute lung injury (EVALI): state of science and future research needs.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2022Review
- Article
- Cannabis Vaping Among Youth and Young Adults: a Scoping Review.Current addiction reports · 2022Article
- Improvement in Pulmonary Function Following Discontinuation of Vaping or E-Cigarette Use in Adolescents with EVALI.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCases of e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) have rapidly reached epidemic proportions, yet there remain limited reports within the literature on the associated imaging findings.
objectiveWe describe the most common imaging findings observed on chest computed tomography (CT) and chest radiograph (CXR) at presentation and at short-term follow-up at our major pediatric hospital. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of the electronic medical records was performed on all patients with suspected EVALI who were treated at a major pediatric hospital and 11 patients were included for analysis. Two board-certified pediatric radiologists then categorized the CXRs as either normal or abnormal, and further performed a systematic review of the chest CTs for imaging findings in the lungs, pleura and mediastinum. Interrater discordance was reconciled by consensus review.
resultsThe 11 patients (9 males:2 females) ranged in age from 14 to 18 years. Gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms were present in all patients, whereas shortness of breath and cough were reported in 5/11 and 6/11 patients, respectively. The CXR was abnormal in 10/11 patients, whereas all chest CTs were abnormal. The most common CT findings included consolidation, ground-glass opacities, interlobular septal thickening, lymphadenopathy and crazy-paving pattern. Almost all patients demonstrated subpleural sparing, and less than half also demonstrated peribronchovascular sparing. There was complete or near-complete resolution of imaging abnormalities in 5/6 patients with a median follow-up duration of 114 days.
conclusionPulmonary opacities with subpleural and peribronchovascular sparing was a commonly observed pattern of EVALI in the pediatric population at this institution. A CXR may not be sufficiently sensitive in diagnosing EVALI, and radiologists and clinicians should exercise caution when excluding EVALI based on the lack of a pulmonary opacity. Caution should also be exercised when excluding EVALI solely based on the lack of respiratory symptoms. Despite extensive pulmonary involvement at presentation, findings may resolve on short-term follow-up imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.