Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495153›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2021

Pelvic lymph node distribution and metastases of prostate and bladder cancer: a systematic literature review and template proposal.

Nikolaos Grivas, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Oscar R Brouwer, Gijs H KleinJan, Miguel Ramirez-Backhaus, Erica A Wilthagen, Henk G van der Poel

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. CanRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikolaos GrivasDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands. nikolaosgrivas@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-978X
Roderick C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Oscar R BrouwerDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gijs H KleinJanDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Miguel Ramirez-BackhausDepartment of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Erica A WilthagenScientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the relevant literature that evaluates the LN topographical distribution and propose a uniform template.

methodsA bibliographic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase and SCOPUS was performed for studies reporting data of LN imaging and/or nodal resection.

results101 and 26 articles met the inclusion criteria for PCa and BCa, respectively. In PCa, the most common locations of positive LNs for surgical and imaging studies were external iliac (both 38 studies), followed by obturator (38 and 37, respectively). Similarly, in BCa, the most common location of positive nodes for surgical and imaging studies were external iliac (19 and 4, respectively), followed by obturator (15 and 3 studies, respectively). In PCa, median percentages of positive external iliac nodes/patient were 12.2% and 11.6% for surgical and imaging studies, respectively while corresponding rates for BCa were 3.9% and 17.6%. There were high risks of bias across studies as well as high heterogeneity in the definition of the anatomic boundaries of lymphadenectomy templates.

conclusionsThis review highlights the lack of detailed information on exact LN templates and metastases location, which in turn hinders generation of high-quality evidence on optimal lymphadenectomy templates. Our proposed template is applicable for both imaging and surgical description and could facilitate the translation of anatomical location from imaging to surgical resection.

Indexed as

HumansLymphatic MetastasisMalePelvisProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder cancerDiagnostic imagingLymph node dissectionProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.