ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2021
Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (GEMCIS) and Novel Inflammatory Markers.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship of nutritional or systemic inflammatory markers with efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without durvalumab therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Focusing on the Immune Cells: Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIt is known that chronic inflammation plays an important role in the etiopathogenesis of biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). In this study, we wanted to examine the effect of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on survival in advanced BTC treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) regimen.
methodsForty-two patients with advanced BTC treated with GEMCIS regimen were included in the study. Measurements for NLR, dNLR and PNI were calculated with available formulas. NLR, dNLR, and PNI values were dichotomized based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (cut-off values 3.94, 2.66, and 46, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for 6-month progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using a Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsThe mean PFS was 5.3 (median 5) months, and the mean OS was 10.7 (median 11) months. The pre-treatment increased NLR (≥ 3.94) value was prognostic for lower 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates. dNLR was not found to be important for survival times. Low PNI (< 36) value was prognostic for lower 6-month PFS and 12-month OS rates. In the multivariate analysis, increased NLR value was determined as an independent prognostic factor for 6-month PFS.
conclusionIn patients with advanced BTC using GEMCIS as the first-line chemotherapy regimen, NLR and PNI can be used as prognostic inflammatory markers for 6-month PFS and 12-month OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.