ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020
Determinants of Trustworthiness to Conduct Medical Research: Findings from Focus Groups Conducted with Racially and Ethnically Diverse Adults.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Culturally Tailored Messages and Trial Registry Enrollment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- The Effect of Racial Concordance on Patient Trust in Online Videos About Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Engendering trustworthiness in the community: Strategies for researchers.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Parent perspectives on neonatal research without prior consent: a mixed-methods interview study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Perceived safety and trust shape transgender and gender diverse participation in exercise science: a consensual qualitative research study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Five Data-Informed Principles for Advancing Inclusive Research in Clinical Trials: A Pharma Perspective.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025Article
- Association between Trust of Researchers and Willingness to Participate in Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Research.Alzheimer's & dementia. Behavior & socioeconomics of aging · 2025Article
- Insights from the development of an online toolkit to promote community engaged substance use research in the Southwest Borderlands Region.Research square · 2025Article
- Article
- "Lord Knows What's Being Done with My Blood!": Black Women's Perceptions of Biospecimen Donation for Clinical Research in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Understanding Inclusion and Participation of People From Black African Diaspora Communities in Health and Care Research: A Realist Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Review
- Standards and infrastructure for multisite deployment of the research participant perception survey.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Application of an implementation premortem: A novel qualitative approach leveraging prospective hindsight to enhance barbershop health interventions for Black men.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Motivation to Clinical Trial Participation: Health Information Distrust and Healthcare Access as Explanatory Variables and Gender as Moderator.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- "How Fluent Do I Need to Be to Say I'm Fluent?" Research Experiences of Communities that Speak Languages Other than English.Community health equity research & policy · 2025Article
- To increase trust in clinical research: Be worthy of trust and enhance the role of clinical research nurses.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The research equity and diversity initiative (READI): Changing the face of clinical research through community outreach and engagement.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape.The Hastings Center report · 2024Article
- "I Have Come Because I See You Care About Me": Recruiting Older Black Americans for Genomic Research.Ethnicity & disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPotential research participants, particularly those from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medical research, often decide to participate based on how they judge people, places, and study protocols as trustworthy. And yet, few studies have explored notions of trustworthiness or determinants of trustworthiness from the perspective of potential medical research participants.
objectiveThis paper describes how racially and ethnically diverse potential medical research participants conceptualize what makes researchers, research settings, and research protocols seem trustworthy.
designUsing a criterion sampling strategy, we recruited African American, Latinx, and White adults for participation in focus groups conducted at a community center servings the Latinx community and at a health clinic that primarily serves the African American community.
participantsA total of 57 African American, Latinx, and White adults APPROACH: We conducted seven focus groups that explored perceptions and determinants of research, trust, privacy, confidentiality, and research participation. We used a phenomenological thematic analytic approach to explore the determinants of trustworthiness to conduct medical research.
resultsIn our effort to identify the factors that affect potential research participants' perspectives on the trustworthiness of medical research, we found three themes: Who is trustworthy to conduct medical research? What influences perceptions of trustworthiness in medical research? And what institutions or settings are trustworthy to conduct medical research?
conclusionsThese findings highlight that one's willingness to participate in research is driven in part by their perception of the trustworthiness of researchers, research institutions, and the information they are given about potential research opportunities. There are important and modifiable determinants of trustworthiness that may facilitate minority participation in research. We found that research, researchers, and research institutions each have things that can be done to increase trustworthiness and minority participation in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.