Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495099›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Determinants of Trustworthiness to Conduct Medical Research: Findings from Focus Groups Conducted with Racially and Ethnically Diverse Adults.

Derek M Griffith, Emily Cornish Jaeger, Erin M Bergner, Sarah Stallings, Consuelo H Wilkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding Inclusion and Participation of People From Black African Diaspora Communities in Health and Care Research: A Realist Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Derek M GriffithCenter for Research on Men's Health, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB# 401814, Nashville, TN, 37240-1814, USA. Derek.griffith@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0018-9176
Emily Cornish JaegerCenter for Research on Men's Health, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB# 401814, Nashville, TN, 37240-1814, USA.
Erin M BergnerCenter for Research on Men's Health, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB# 401814, Nashville, TN, 37240-1814, USA.
Sarah StallingsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, USA.
Consuelo H WilkinsMeharry-Vanderbilt Alliance, Nashville, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings - GetPreCiSeRM1HG009034 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CLAYTON, ELLEN WRIGHT, MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2016 to 2024
$8.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009034NIH HHS 1RM1HG009034-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotential research participants, particularly those from racial and ethnic groups underrepresented in medical research, often decide to participate based on how they judge people, places, and study protocols as trustworthy. And yet, few studies have explored notions of trustworthiness or determinants of trustworthiness from the perspective of potential medical research participants.

objectiveThis paper describes how racially and ethnically diverse potential medical research participants conceptualize what makes researchers, research settings, and research protocols seem trustworthy.

designUsing a criterion sampling strategy, we recruited African American, Latinx, and White adults for participation in focus groups conducted at a community center servings the Latinx community and at a health clinic that primarily serves the African American community.

participantsA total of 57 African American, Latinx, and White adults APPROACH: We conducted seven focus groups that explored perceptions and determinants of research, trust, privacy, confidentiality, and research participation. We used a phenomenological thematic analytic approach to explore the determinants of trustworthiness to conduct medical research.

resultsIn our effort to identify the factors that affect potential research participants' perspectives on the trustworthiness of medical research, we found three themes: Who is trustworthy to conduct medical research? What influences perceptions of trustworthiness in medical research? And what institutions or settings are trustworthy to conduct medical research?

conclusionsThese findings highlight that one's willingness to participate in research is driven in part by their perception of the trustworthiness of researchers, research institutions, and the information they are given about potential research opportunities. There are important and modifiable determinants of trustworthiness that may facilitate minority participation in research. We found that research, researchers, and research institutions each have things that can be done to increase trustworthiness and minority participation in research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBlack or African AmericanAdultFocus GroupsHumansMinority GroupsWhite Peoplefocus groupsminority researchqualitative researchresearch participationtrust

Identifiers

PMID32495099
PMCPMC7573005
OpenAlexW3032353690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.