Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495064›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony analzyed by Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT and F-18 FDG PET in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and the prognostic value.

Yi Tian, Min Zhao, Weilong Li, Ziwei Zhu, Hongzhi Mi, Xiang Li, Xiaoli Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Left ventricular mechanical dyssnchrony: A potential new marker for 3-vessel CAD.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. The assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gatedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Evaluation of dyssynchrony with nuclear cardiac imaging: New evidence for an old parameter.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. The feasibility ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi TianDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2, Anzhen Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 87, Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan Province, China. mzhao1981@csu.edu.cn.
Weilong LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Shandong, China.
Ziwei ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2, Anzhen Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Hongzhi MiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2, Anzhen Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Xiang LiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Xiaoli ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 2, Anzhen Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. xlzhang68@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571717National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871377National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the left ventricular (LV) phase dyssynchrony parameters obtained from Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT (GSPECT) and F-18 FDG PET(GPET), as well as the prognostic values in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Consecutive ICM patients referred for myocardial viability assessment were retrospectively evaluated and were followed-up for 21 ± 5 months. Phase parameter from both GSPECT and GPET were analyzed by QGS software, including histogram bandwidth (BW), standard deviation (SD) and entropy. Independent predictor for cardiac death was analyzed by Cox regression analysis. The estimated cardiac survival curve was analyzed by and was compared with the log-rank test. Eight-eight (mean age 56 ± 10, male 94%, LVEF

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Function, LeftAgedCardiomyopathiesDeath, Sudden, CardiacFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiMechanical dyssynchronyPETPhase analysisSPECT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.