ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Abdominal imaging in cystic fibrosis].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Pulmonary imaging of cystic fibrosis with a focus on children and adolescents].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Imaging of metabolic and overload disorders in tissues and organs.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Preliminary results of abdominal simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging with motion-correction in patients with cystic fibrosis and impaired compliance.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueAbdominal complications are often the first indications for cystic fibrosis (CF), a multiorgan disease. A broad range of abdominal manifestations are associated with the disease, including gastrointestinal abnormalities (such as meconium ileus in newborns and distal intestinal obstruction syndrome in older children) and hepatobiliary alterations (e.g., cholelithiasis, microgallbladder, hepatosteatosis, biliary cirrhosis). A characteristic finding is pancreatic involvement, which leads to exocrine and over the course of time to endocrine insufficiency. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsUltrasonography is the preferred and often sole modality for a precise diagnosis of abdominal CF manifestations. However, all imaging modalities can be used, depending on the pathology: X‑ray, fluoroscopic examinations, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging (also with application of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography). METHODICAL INNOVATIONS/PERFORMANCE: Scoring systems are useful for standardized diagnostics. Sonographic findings, described using a scoring system, correlate with clinical symptoms, such as pancreatic lipomatosis with abdominal pain (p = 0.018), flatulence (p = 0.006), and gastroesophageal reflux (p = 0.006). EVALUATION/PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: A standardized approach with structured reporting is important due to the numerous abdominal CF manifestations. To enable precise follow-up analyses, scoring systems based on sonographic findings are excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.