Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495003›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2020

Common Cold and Acute Rhinosinusitis: Up-to-Date Management in 2020.

Francesca Jaume, Meritxell Valls-Mateus, Joaquim Mullol

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06613906 (Efficacy and Safety of Healsea® Isotonic Nasal Spray in the Prevention of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections With Nasal Symptoms in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06613906 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Healsea® Isotonic Nasal Spray in the Prevention of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections With Nasal Symptoms in Adults: a Pre-market Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorLallemand Pharma AGRan2024 to 2025Enrolled198ConditionsHealthy Subjects (HS)ArmsHealsea Children nasal spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Distinct gut microbiota profiles in acute vs. chronic sinusitis: potential biomarkers.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Immunomodulatory Effects ofExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  19. Long-term benefits of EPsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca JaumeServei d'Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Comarcal d'Inca, Carretera Vella de Llubí, 07300, Inca, Illes Balears, Spain. fjaumemonroig@hotmail.com.
Meritxell Valls-MateusServei d'Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma, Illes Balears, Spain.
Joaquim MullolUnitat de Rinologia i Clínica de l'Olfacte, Servei d'Otorinolaringologia, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. jmullol@clinic.cat.
Hospital Comarcal de Inca · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purposes of the review are as follows: (1) to define acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and their phenotypes, (2) to highlight the ARS management according to international guidelines, (3) to compare the physicians' management with the ARS guideline recommendations, and (4) to report ARS socioeconomic burden. RECENT

findingsBacterial and non-bacterial ARS have similar symptoms, although they can be discriminated by using a combination of specific signs and symptoms. The prescription of antibiotics should be limited to clearly suspected bacterial ARS. There is an overuse of diagnosis tools and treatment prescriptions. The total cost per ARS episode in Europe is over €1000. ARS is mainly an inflammatory disease triggered by viral infection, and few cases end up developing bacterial infection. In most of the cases, it is a self-resolving disease which diagnosis is mainly clinical and the treatment symptomatic. The incidence of complications is low and independent of antibiotic use. There is a high socioeconomic burden associated to ARS.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCommon ColdHistory, 21st CenturyHumansRhinitisSinusitisVirus DiseasesAcute rhinosinusitisBacterial acute rhinosinusitisCommon coldCostsEPOSRespiratory tract infections

Identifiers

PMID32495003
PMCPMC7266914
OpenAlexW3029243269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.