Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494989›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Self-reported clinical pharmacy service provision in Austria: an analysis of both the community and hospital pharmacy sector-a national study.

S Deibl, D Mueller, K Kirchdorfer, G Stemer, M Hoppel, A E Weidmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S DeiblÖsterreichische Apothekerkammer, Spitalgasse 31, Postfach 87, 1091, Vienna, Austria. stefan.deibl@apothekerkammer.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-9941
D MuellerVienna Pharmacy Department, Hanusch-Hospital, Heinrich Collin-Straße 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
K KirchdorferVienna Pharmacy Department, Hanusch-Hospital, Heinrich Collin-Straße 30, 1140, Vienna, Austria.
G StemerPharmacy Department, Vienna General Hospital - Medical University Campus, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
M HoppelÖsterreichische Apothekerkammer, Spitalgasse 31, Postfach 87, 1091, Vienna, Austria.
A E WeidmannSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background With expansion of more advanced clinical roles for pharmacists we need to be mindful that the extent to which clinical pharmacy services are implemented varies from one country to another. To date no comprehensive assessment of number and types of services provided by either community or hospital pharmacies in Austria exists. Objective To analyse and describe the number and types of clinical pharmacy services provided in both community and hospital pharmacies, as well as the level of clinical pharmacy education of pharmacists across Austria. Setting Austrian community and hospital pharmacies. Method An electronic questionnaire to determine number and types of clinical pharmacy services provided was send to all chief pharmacists at all community (n = 1365) and hospital pharmacies (n = 40) across Austria. Besides current and future services provision, education and training provision were also assessed. Main outcome measure Extent of and attitude towards CPS in Austria. Results Response rates to the surveys were 19.1% (n = 261/1365) in community and 92.5% (n = 37/40) in hospital pharmacies. 59.0% and 89.2% of community and hospital pharmacies, respectively, indicated that the provision of clinical pharmacy services in Austria has increased substantially over the past 10 years. Fifty-one percent of community pharmacies reported to provide a medication review service, while 97.3% of hospitals provide a range of services. Only 18.0% of community pharmacies offer services other than medication review services at dispensing. Binary regressions show that provision of already established medication management is a predictor for the willingness of community pharmacists to extend the range of CPS (p < 0.01), while completed training in the area of clinical pharmacy is not (p > 0.05). More hospital than community pharmacists have postgraduate education in clinical pharmacy (17.4% vs 6.5%). A desire to complete postgraduate education was shown by 28.3% of community and 14.7% of hospital pharmacists. Lack of time, inadequate remuneration, lack of resources and poor relationship between pharmacists and physicians were highlighted as barriers. Conclusion Both community and hospital pharmacists show strong willingness to expand their service provision and will need continued support, such as improved legislative structures, more supportive resources and practice focused training opportunities, to further these services.

Indexed as

AustriaCommunity Pharmacy ServicesEducation, PharmacyHumansPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalPilot ProjectsProfessional RoleSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAustriaClinical pharmacyClinical pharmacy service provisionCommunity pharmacyHospital pharmacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.