ArticleHormones & cancer2020
Heterogeneous Associations Between Obesity and Reproductive-Related Factors and Specific Breast Cancer Subtypes Among Hong Kong Chinese Women.
Article in Hormones & cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The unique risk factor profile of triple-negative breast cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Pooled it
- Association of reproductive risk factors and breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Efficiency for evaluation of disease etiologic heterogeneity in case-case and case-control studies.The international journal of biostatistics · 2025Article
- A pooled case-only analysis of obesity and breast cancer subtype among Black women in the southeastern United States.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022Article
- Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Understanding p53 tumour suppressor network.Biology direct · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies reported heterogeneous associations between obesity and reproductive-related breast cancer risk factors and breast cancer intrinsic subtypes; however, few studies have been conducted in Asian populations. Here, we aimed to examine whether risks associated with established breast cancer risk factors varied by breast cancer subtypes in Chinese women. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study in Hong Kong, including a total of 2169 Chinese women. Unconditional polytomous logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals(95%CIs) to estimate relative risks associated with examined risk factors in case-control analyses and to test for heterogeneity across breast cancer subtypes in case-case analyses. In case-case analyses, compared with luminal A patients, luminal B (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.07-2.88), HER2 overexpressing (AOR = 3.40, 95% CI = 1.56-7.39), and triple negative (TNBC, AOR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.18-4.82) patients were more likely to be postmenopausal. In case-control analyses, reduced risks associated with parity and younger age at first birth were only seen for luminal A and B cases especially among postmenopausal women, whereas having ≥ 3 children was associated with increased risk for HER2 overexpressing and TNBC among premenopausal women. Obesity was associated with increased risk for all subtypes. We found heterogeneous associations between parity-related risk factors by menopausal status and breast cancer subtypes among Chinese patients, which is similar to those observed in Western populations. Interestingly, obesity was associated with increased breast cancer risk regardless of menopausal status or subtypes, except for premenopausal luminal patients, which appears to be unique in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.