Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494963›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2020

Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronically occluded internal carotid artery: feasibility, safety, a modified radiographic classification system, and clinical outcomes.

Liumei Mo, Guixian Ma, Chengbo Dai, Shuo Wang, Changmao Li, Tengyun Ma, Zhexian Yang, Chizhong He, Hao Xiao, Lijuan Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Staged endovascular recanalization for symptomatic atherosclerotic non-acutely occluded internal carotid artery.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liumei MoDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Guixian MaDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chengbo DaiDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Shuo Wang
Changmao LiDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Tengyun MaDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zhexian YangDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chizhong HeDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Hao XiaoDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jinhai DuanDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yuhu ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Guangdong Neuroscience Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China. yhzhangsd@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-4669
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

Guangzhou Municipal People's Livelihood Science and Technology Project No.201803010085High-level Hospital Construction Project No.DFJH201907Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China No. 2017B030311015National Key R&D Program of China No. 2017YFC1310200Science and Technology Plan Foundation of Guangzhou No.201904010066Supporting Research Funds for Outstanding Young Medical Talents in Guangdong Province No.KJ012019442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO); to propose a newly modified radiographic classification of ICAO that can rigorously identify suitable candidates for endovascular ICAO treatment.

methodsWe included 42 consecutive patients who had ICAO with ischaemic symptoms refractory to medical therapy. We examined the symptomatology, complications, follow-up results and radiographic images of ICAO receiving attempted endovascular treatment. We attempted to stratify all radiographic images into categories based on morphological occlusion patterns, occlusion segments and distal ICA reconstitution on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

resultsFour types (A-D) of radiographic ICAO were identified. We redefined type B as having a tapered stump but no distal lumen. The rate of successful recanalization was 83.33% (35/42 ICAOs; type A, 18/20; type B, 7/10; type C, 10/11; type D, 0/1). The perioperative complication rate was 11.90% (5/42), including 3 asymptomatic distal embolisms, 1 symptomatic cerebral infarction and 1 asymptomatic carotid artery dissection. None of these technique-related complications led to severe neurological damage or death. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores after 1-20 months of follow-up were significantly decreased in successfully revascularized patients (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in mRS scores in the 7 patients in whom recanalization failed (P > 0.05).

conclusionsEndovascular recanalization seems to achieve technical success and clinical improvement for symptomatic subacute and chronic ICAO. Additionally, our newly modified radiographic classification of ICAO may be valuable in assessing the technical feasibility and safety of procedures in symptomatic ICAO patients.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery, InternalAdultAgedCarotid StenosisEndovascular ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPatient SafetyRetrospective StudiesCarotidmRS scoreOcclusionRadiographic classificationStrokeSymptomatic

Identifiers

PMID32494963
OpenAlexW3030649653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.