ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Adjusted mechanical alignment: operative technique-Tips and tricks].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardizing definitions of the total knee alignment techniques: recommendations by the Personalized Arthroplasty Society.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - there is no winner yet.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Review
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Inversed Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty by Asia Specific (Huang's) Phenotypes, a Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Navigated, gap-balanced, adjusted mechanical alignment achieves alignment and balancing goals in a very high percentage but with partially non-anatomical resections.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Digital TKA Alignment Training with a New Digital Simulation Tool (Knee-CAT) Improves Process Quality, Efficiency, and Confidence.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Trends in Computer-Assisted Surgery for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Germany: An Analysis Based on the Operative Procedure Classification System between 2010 to 2021.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Alignment analysis of Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMechanical alignment (MA) is a standardized procedure that aims to achieve a neutrally aligned leg axis. An alignment of the prosthesis closer to the patient's anatomy can be an approach for better clinical outcomes. The surgical technique of adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) presented here is a modified extension-gap-first technique that takes into account the natural ligamentous tension of the knee joint so that ligamentous releases can be avoided as far as possible. INDICATION: The aMA technique can be used for primary and secondary varus gonarthrosis of up to 20° of varus. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The aim of the operation is to achieve a balanced ligament tension through a femoral osseous correction rather than ligament releases. TEA and the sulcus line are marked to control the ligament-based femoral rotation. The osteophytes are removed to ensure a reliable ligament tension. A quantitative ligament tensioner is stretched with great care, and gap width as well as medial and lateral ligament tension are read off. In order to correct an extension gap asymmetry, instead of the typical medial soft tissue release, the asymmetry is compensated by a special femoral cutting block. Now, the flexion gap is assessed, whereby the transverse femoral rotation follows the soft tissue tension. The tensioner adjusts a rectangular flexion gap with balanced ligament tension. After a final balancing of the gaps, the femoral preparation is completed and the trial components are inserted. Here, the rotation of the tibial component is set by repeated flexion-extension cycles. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe technique presented combines a measured-resection technique with individual ligament tension. The maximum deviation of the femoral alignment in the coronal plane from the neutral alignment is 2.5°. In order to avoid problems, it is recommended, as with the described technique, to achieve a component alignment based on the patient anatomy by adjusting the femoral component. The measured-resection technique carries the risk of flexion instability. With the gap-balancing technique symmetrical ligament tension can be achieved, assuming precise proximal tibial cuts. When aligning the femoral component rotation, flexion gap stability and patella tracking should be considered. Long-term studies of high case numbers are necessary to evaluate the good short-term results of the presented surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32494903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.