ArticleJournal of neurology2020
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular migraine and Menière's disease: cVEMPs make the difference.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Low-Dose BoNT-A Acupoint Injections in Managing Headache, Vertigo, and Allodynia in Vestibular Migraine.The journal of international advanced otology · 2025Article
- Clinical Profile, Trends, and Management in Pediatric Patients with Audiovestibular Disorders: Can We Predict Emotional Disability in Pediatric Patients with Episodes of Vertigo and Dizziness?Audiology research · 2024Article
- Audio-vestibular Findings in a Patient with Pelizaeus- Merzbacher Disease.The journal of international advanced otology · 2024Article
- Review
- Augmented ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023Article
- Can Auditory and Vestibular Findings Differentiate Vestibular Migraine and Meniere's Disease?Journal of audiology & otology · 2023Article
- Vestibular migraine or Meniere's disease: a diagnostic dilemma.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Saccular functions differ for Meniere's disease with and without coexisting headaches.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Vestibular Migraine.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Development and Validation of the Predictive Model for the Differentiation between Vestibular Migraine and Meniere's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Update on diagnosis and differential diagnosis of vestibular migraine.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière's disease: A comparison of the diagnostic value of multiple scoring methods.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Endolymphatic Hydrops in Patients With Vestibular Migraine and Concurrent Meniere's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Intravenous Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Endolymphatic Space: A Methodological Comparative Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Recurrent Vestibular Symptoms Not Otherwise Specified: Clinical Characteristics Compared With Vestibular Migraine and Menière's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) have been suggested as biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of Menière's disease (MD) and vestibular migraine (VM). The aim of this study was to compare the degree of asymmetry for ocular (o) and cervical (c) VEMPs in large cohorts of patients with MD and VM and to follow up the responses. STUDY
designRetrospective study in an interdisciplinary tertiary center for vertigo and balance disorders.
methodscVEMPs to air-conducted sound and oVEMPs to bone-conducted vibration were recorded in 100 patients with VM and unilateral MD, respectively. Outcome parameters were asymmetry ratios (ARs) of oVEMP n10p15 and cVEMP p13n23 amplitudes, and of the respective latencies (mean ± SD).
resultsThe AR of cVEMP p13n23 amplitudes was significantly higher for MD (0.43 ± 0.34) than for VM (0.26 ± 0.24; adjusted p = 0.0002). MD-but not VM-patients displayed a higher AR for cVEMP than for oVEMP amplitudes (MD 0.43 ± 0.34 versus 0.23 ± 0.22, p < 0.0001; VM 0.26 ± 0.14 versus 0.19 ± 0.15, p = 0.11). Monitoring of VEMPs in single patients indicated stable or fluctuating amplitude ARs in VM, while ARs in MD appeared to increase or remain stable over time. No differences were observed for latency ARs between MD and VM.
conclusionsThese results are in line with (1) a more common saccular than utricular dysfunction in MD and (2) a more permanent loss of otolith function in MD versus VM. The different patterns of o- and cVEMP responses, in particular their longitudinal assessment, might add to the differential diagnosis between MD and VM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.