Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494774›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2019

Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness and method use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam.

Maria F Gallo, Nghia Nguyen, Chuong Nguyen, Markus J Steiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria F GalloThe Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Nghia NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vinmec International Hospital, 458 Minh Khai, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Chuong NguyenDepartment of Research and Training, Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, La Thanh Road, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Markus J SteinerContraceptive Technology Innovation Division, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell Street, Durham, NC 27701, USA.
Family Health International 360 · USThe Ohio State University · USVinmec International Hospital · VN

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between contraceptive knowledge and type of method used.

methodsWe analyzed data from a cross-sectional study of sexually active women in Hanoi, Vietnam, not desiring pregnancy. We used linear and logistic regression to evaluate contraceptive knowledge of users of the intrauterine device (IUD), combination oral contraception (COC) and male condoms. We measured contraceptive knowledge with seven questions on relative effectiveness of methods, reversibility, covert use, contraindications and side effects.

resultsRespondents used IUD (

conclusionsIUD users more often recognized that the IUD is highly effective while condom users appeared to overestimate condom effectiveness. Contraceptive counseling should ensure that women understand the relative effectiveness of methods. We found no evidence that other types of contraceptive knowledge differed by type of method used. IMPLICATIONS: Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness was the sole difference detected in contraceptive knowledge between women in Hanoi, Vietnam, using the IUD, COC or male condoms.

Indexed as

ContraceptionEducationKnowledgeVietnamWomen

Identifiers

PMID32494774
PMCPMC7252424
OpenAlexW2958559221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.