Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494578›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology letters2019

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Arlene Blum, Mamta Behl, Linda Birnbaum, Miriam L Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S Sipes, Heather M Stapleton, Marta Venier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. An environmentally relevant mixture of organophosphate esters induces cholesterol biosynthesis in THP-1 macrophages.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arlene BlumGreen Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, CA, 94709, and Department of Chemistry, UC Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94705.
Mamta BehlNational Toxicology Program, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Linda BirnbaumNational Cancer Institute at NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Miriam L DiamondDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada M5S 3B1.
Allison PhillipsRisk Assessment and Natural Resource Sciences Inc., Arcadis, Raleigh, NC 27607.
Veena SinglaProgram on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Nisha S SipesNational Toxicology Program, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Heather M StapletonDuke University, Nicholas School of the Environment, Durham, NC, 27708g.
Marta VenierO' Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47401.

Funding

Studies of the fate of environmental contaminants in humans and animalsZIABC011476 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BIRNBAUM, LINDA · 2013 to 2019
$5.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and the entire class of organohalogen flame retardants, is declining, the use of organophosphate esters flame retardants (OPFRs) is increasing. In this paper, we ask whether OPFRs are a better choice than PBDEs. To address this question, we compared OPFRs with PBDEs for a wide range of properties. OPFRs exposure is ubiquitous in people and in outdoor and indoor environments, and are now often found at higher levels compared to PBDE peak exposure levels. Furthermore, data from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments all suggest that there are health concerns at current exposure levels for both halogenated and non-halogenated OPFRs. Obtaining the scientific evidence needed for regulation of OPFRs can take many years. Given the large number of OPFRs in use, manufacturers can move towards healthier and safer products by developing innovative ways to reduce fire hazard for electronics enclosures, upholstered furniture, building materials and other consumer products without adding flame retardant chemicals.

Identifiers

PMID32494578
PMCPMC7269169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.