Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494507›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2020

Role of Cross-sectional Imaging (CT/MRI) in Characterization and Distinguishing Benign from Malignant/Potentially Malignant Cystic Lesions of Pancreas.

Amy Sara Abraham, Betty Simon, Anu Eapen, Kirthi Sathyakumar, Anuradha Chandramohan, Ravish Sanghi Raju, Philip Joseph, Thomas Alex Kodiatte, Mahasampath Gowri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pancreatic pseudocyst: The past, the present, and the future.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Cystic pancreatic lesions, the endless dilemma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy Sara AbrahamDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Betty SimonDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anu EapenDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kirthi SathyakumarDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anuradha ChandramohanDepartments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ravish Sanghi RajuDepartments of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Philip JosephDepartments of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Thomas Alex KodiatteDepartments of Pathology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mahasampath GowriBiostatistics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) in characterizing cystic lesions of the pancreas and in differentiating between benign and malignant/potentially malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective study was performed on patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent pre-operative imaging and surgery between October 2004 and April 2017 at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The images were reviewed for specific characteristics and diagnoses recorded independently by two radiologists who were blinded to the histopathological examination (HPE) report. Radiological diagnostic accuracy was assessed with HPE as reference standard.

resultsA total of 80 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (M: F = 27:53). The final HPE diagnoses were solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (32.5%), walled off necrosis/pseudocyst (27.5%), mucinous cystadenoma (15%), serous cystadenoma (11.25%), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (8.75%), mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (2.5%), simple epithelial cyst (1.25%), and unspecified benign cystic lesion (1.25%). Observer1 correctly identified the diagnosis in 73.75% of cases while observer 2 did so in 72.5%. Sensitivity for distinguishing benign versus malignant/potentially malignant lesions was 85.1% for observer 1 and 80.9% for observer 2. On multivariate logistic regression analysis: Solid cystic morphology, presence of mural nodule, and female gender were associated with premalignant/malignant lesions.

conclusionCross-sectional imaging is a valuable tool for characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions within its limitations.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyCystsMagnetic resonance imagingNeoplasmsPancreas

Identifiers

PMID32494507
PMCPMC7265468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.