Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494221›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Impact of real-time, dose-escalated permanent seed implant brachytherapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

O Pons-Llanas, E Collado-Ballesteros, S Roldan-Ortega, A Conde-Moreno, F Celada-Alvarez, F Martínez-Arcelus, M J Pérez-Calatayud, V Carmona-Meseguer, J Gimeno-Olmos, V Forner-Ferrer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

O Pons-LlanasRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
E Collado-BallesterosRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
S Roldan-OrtegaRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
A Conde-MorenoRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
F Celada-AlvarezRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
F Martínez-ArcelusRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
M J Pérez-CalatayudRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
V Carmona-MeseguerRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
J Gimeno-OlmosRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
V Forner-FerrerBiostatistics Unity, Medical Research Institute La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
A Tormo-MicóRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
J Perez-CalatayudRadiotherapy Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia Spain.
J López-TorrecillaRadiotherapy Department, General University Hospital, Valencia Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo retrospectively evaluate biochemical control and toxicity in patients who underwent 125I seed brachytherapy (BT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween January 2004-December 2014, 395 patients with intermediate-risk PCa underwent 125I BT. Of these, 117 underwent preoperative planning (PP; 145 Gy) and 278 real-time intraoperative preplanning (IoP; 160 Gy). All patients were followed for ≥ 6 months (> 5 years in 48% of patients and > 7 years in 13%). Median follow-up was 59 months.

resultsBiochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates at 5 and 8 years were, respectively, 91.7% and 82.1%. By treatment group, the corresponding BRFS rates were 93.5% and 90% for IoP and 89% and 76.8% for PP. The maximum dose to the urethra remained unchanged (217 Gy) despite the dose escalation (from 145 to 160 Gy), without any significant increase in treatment-related toxicity (p = 0.13). Overall toxicity outcomes in the series were excellent, with only 3 cases (0.76%) of grade 3 genitourinary toxicity.

conclusionThe real-time intraoperative planning technique at 160 Gy yields better biochemical controls than the preoperative planning technique at 145 Gy. Dose escalation did not increase urinary toxicity. The excellent results obtained with the IoP BT technique support its use as the first treatment option in this patient population.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyCancer prostatePermanent implantSeed I125

Identifiers

PMID32494221
PMCPMC7256233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.