Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32494060›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

The effect of Virtual Reality on evoked potentials following painful electrical stimuli and subjective pain.

E J Lier, J M Oosterman, R Assmann, M de Vries, H van Goor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06292663 (Can Preoperative Information Via Virtual Reality Affect Patient's Anxiety? A Randomized Controlled Trial and Patient Interviews), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06292663 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Can Preoperative Information Via Virtual Reality Affect Patient's Anxiety? A Randomized Controlled Trial and Patient Interviews

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled88ConditionsAnxiety, Surgery, PainArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Attentional modulation of sensory gating during a visuomotor task.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Extended reality in anesthesia: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E J LierDepartment of Surgery, Radboud university medical center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. janienkelier@gmail.com.
J M OostermanRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R AssmannDepartment of Surgery, Radboud university medical center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M de VriesDepartment of Surgery, Radboud university medical center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud university medical center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) has been shown to reduce pain, however outcome parameters of previous studies have primarily been of a subjective nature and susceptible to bias. This study investigated the effect of VR on cortical processing of evoked potentials (EPs) and subjectively reported pain. Additionally, we explored whether subjects' demographic and personal characteristics modulated the effect of VR analgesia.

methodsThree VR conditions were compared in a randomized cross-over study of 30 healthy volunteers: Passive VR (i.e. no interaction possible with the virtual world), active VR (interactive virtual environment) and no VR (black screen). Subjects received noxious electrical stimuli at random intervals during all conditions. EPs, recorded at Cz, were extracted time locked to stimuli. Pain scores were reported after each condition.

resultsActive VR significantly decreased pain scores and amplitudes of N1 and P3. Passive VR had no analgesic effect. Age was significantly correlated to pain scores, with older subjects demonstrating larger effects of VR. Gender, game experience, and susceptibility for immersion, did not influence VR analgesia.

conclusionActive VR decreases pre-perceptual and perceptual brain activity following painful electrical stimuli, corresponding with reduced pain experience. VR has potential to serve as a non-pharmacologic treatment for pain, particularly in elderly patients.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsPainPain ManagementPain PerceptionVirtual RealityAdultAnalgesiaAttentionBrainCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID32494060
PMCPMC7270181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.