Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A QSP model of prostate cancer immunotherapy to identify effective combination therapies.

Roberta Coletti, Lorena Leonardelli, Silvia Parolo, Luca Marchetti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy response evaluation using oncophysics-based mathematical models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta ColettiUniversity of Trento, Department of mathematics, Trento, 38123, Italy.
Lorena LeonardelliFondazione The Microsoft Research - University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, 38068, Italy.
Silvia ParoloFondazione The Microsoft Research - University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, 38068, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-5353
Luca MarchettiFondazione The Microsoft Research - University of Trento Centre for Computational and Systems Biology (COSBI), Rovereto, 38068, Italy. marchetti@cosbi.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9043-7705
University of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy, by enhancing the endogenous anti-tumor immune responses, is showing promising results for the treatment of numerous cancers refractory to conventional therapies. However, its effectiveness for advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer remains unsatisfactory and new therapeutic strategies need to be developed. To this end, systems pharmacology modeling provides a quantitative framework to test in silico the efficacy of new treatments and combination therapies. In this paper we present a new Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model of prostate cancer immunotherapy, calibrated using data from pre-clinical experiments in prostate cancer mouse models. We developed the model by using Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) describing the tumor, key components of the immune system, and seven treatments. Numerous combination therapies were evaluated considering both the degree of tumor inhibition and the predicted synergistic effects, integrated into a decision tree. Our simulations predicted cancer vaccine combined with immune checkpoint blockade as the most effective dual-drug combination immunotherapy for subjects treated with androgen-deprivation therapy that developed resistance. Overall, the model presented here serves as a computational framework to support drug development, by generating hypotheses that can be tested experimentally in pre-clinical models.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyMaleMiceModels, BiologicalProstateProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantCancer VaccinesImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32493951
PMCPMC7270132
OpenAlexW3028956199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.