Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493787›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2020

Utilization, Yield, and Accuracy of the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel with Diagnostic Stewardship and Testing Algorithm.

M Jana Broadhurst, Shefali Dujari, Indre Budvytiene, Benjamin A Pinsky, Carl A Gold, Niaz Banaei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Real-World Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray ME Panel: Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The clinical impact of herpesvirus testing on multiplex PCR panels in a pediatric population.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Jana BroadhurstDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Shefali DujariDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Indre BudvytieneClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Benjamin A PinskyDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8751-4810
Carl A GoldDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Niaz BanaeiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA nbanaei@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of diagnostic stewardship and testing algorithms on the utilization and performance of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel has received limited investigation. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study assessing all individuals with suspected ME between February 2017 and April 2019 for whom the ME panel was ordered. Testing was restricted to patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis. Positive ME panel results were confirmed before reporting through correlation with direct staining (Gram and calcofluor white) and CSF cryptococcal antigen or by repeat ME panel testing. Outcomes included the ME panel test utilization rate, negative predictive value of nonpleocytic CSF samples, test yield and false-positivity rate, and time to appropriate deescalation of acyclovir. Restricting testing to pleocytic CSF samples reduced ME panel utilization by 42.7% (263 versus 459 tests performed) and increased the test yield by 61.8% (18.6% versus 11.5% positivity rate;

Indexed as

EncephalitisMeningitisAlgorithmsCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective Studiesdiagnostic stewardshipencephalitisFilmArraymeningitisME panelmultiplex PCR

Identifiers

PMID32493787
PMCPMC7448656
OpenAlexW3030897705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.