Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493515›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2020

e-Health interventions for healthy aging: a systematic review.

Ronald Buyl, Idrissa Beogo, Maaike Fobelets, Carole Deletroz, Philip Van Landuyt, Samantha Dequanter, Ellen Gorus, Anne Bourbonnais, Anik Giguère, Kathleen Lechasseur and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The Influence of Robot-Assisted Learning System on Health Literacy and Learning Perception.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reporting randomised trials of physical exercise or training interventions in older adults: the PETIO guideline.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ronald BuylFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics(BISI) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium. ronald.buyl@vub.be.ORCID 0000-0002-6598-9505
Idrissa BeogoÉcole des sciences infirmières et des études de la santé/School of Nursing and Health Studies, Université de Saint-Boniface, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Maaike FobeletsFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics(BISI) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Carole DeletrozSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Avenue de Beaumont 21, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philip Van LanduytFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics(BISI) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Samantha DequanterFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics(BISI) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Ellen GorusFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Gerontology, Frailty in Ageing (FRIA) Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Anne BourbonnaisFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anik GiguèreFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Kathleen LechasseurFaculty of Nursing Sciences, Université Laval, Québec, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonCentre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthy aging (HA) is a contemporary challenge for population health worldwide. Electronic health (e-Health) interventions have the potential to support empowerment and education of adults aged 50 and over.

objectivesTo summarize evidence on the effectiveness of e-Health interventions on HA and explore how specific e-Health interventions and their characteristics effectively impact HA.

methodsA systematic review was conducted based on the Cochrane Collaboration methods including any experimental study design published in French, Dutch, Spanish, and English from 2000 to 2018.

resultsFourteen studies comparing various e-Health interventions to multiple components controls were included. The target population, type of interventions, and outcomes measured were very heterogeneous across studies; thus, a meta-analysis was not possible. However, effect estimates indicate that e-Health interventions could improve physical activity. Positive effects were also found for other healthy behaviors (e.g., healthy eating), psychological outcomes (e.g., memory), and clinical parameters (e.g., blood pressure). Given the low certainty of the evidence related to most outcomes, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

conclusionsThis systematic review found limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of e-Health interventions, although the majority of studies show positive effects of these interventions for improving physical activity in older adults. Thus, better quality evidence is needed regarding the effects of e-Health on the physiological, psychological, and social dimensions of HA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42016033163).

Indexed as

Healthy AgingAgedElectronicsExerciseHealth BehaviorHumansMiddle Agede-Healthe-Health interventionHealthy agingInformation technology

Identifiers

PMID32493515
PMCPMC7271471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.