Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493493›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2020

Latinx bullying and depression in children and youth: a systematic review.

Karen Lutrick, Robert Clark, Velia Leybas Nuño, Sheri Bauman, Scott Carvajal

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acculturative stress among Latino youth: A bioecological framework.Advances in psychiatry and behavioral health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen LutrickCollege of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. klutrick@email.arizona.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3480-849X
Robert ClarkMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, PO Box 245016, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Velia Leybas NuñoMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, PO Box 245016, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Sheri BaumanCollege of Education, Disability Psychoeducation Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Scott CarvajalMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Health Promotion Sciences, University of Arizona, PO Box 245016, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBullying is associated with negative health outcomes such as depression. Most studies target non-Latinxs, though they often experience higher rates of bullying and depression. This review examines the inclusion of Latinxs in studies of bullying and depression and factors unique to them.

methodsDatabases were searched for articles related to bullying and depression. Two reviewers found 957 publications and identified 17 for inclusion.

resultsAll 17 studies demonstrated a relationship between bullying and depression. Nine examined variables unique to Latinxs.

conclusionsStudies that included variables unique to Latinxs found a stronger relationship between bullying and depression. Inclusive measures and design are key to understanding and reducing the consequences of bullying in this population.

Indexed as

BullyingDepressionAdolescentChildHumansAdolescent healthBullyingDepressionLatinx/Hispanic

Identifiers

PMID32493493
PMCPMC7268476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.