Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493485›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

Applied systems thinking: a viable approach to identify leverage points for accelerating progress towards ending neglected tropical diseases.

Jeffrey Glenn, Kimberly Kamara, Zaiyanatu Abubakar Umar, Teresa Chahine, Nils Daulaire, Thomas Bossert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Healthcare Policies to Eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in India: A Roadmap.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey GlennDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, 2032 LSB, Provo, UT, United States of America. jeff_glenn@byu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-3435
Kimberly KamaraThe END Fund, New York, NY, United States of America.
Zaiyanatu Abubakar UmarNeglected Tropical Diseases Division, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Teresa ChahineYale School of Management, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Nils DaulaireHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Thomas BossertHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Harvard University · USBrigham Young University · USFederal Ministry of Health · NGYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863Walker Family Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems thinking is a conceptual approach that can assist stakeholders in understanding complexity and making progress on persistent public health challenges. Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), a complex global health problem, are responsible for a large disease burden among impoverished populations around the world. This aim of this study was to better discern the many complexities of the global NTD system in order to identify and act on leverage points to catalyse progress towards ending NTDs.

methodsExisting frameworks for systems change were adapted to form the conceptual framework for the study. Using a semi-structured interview guide, key informant interviews were conducted with NTD stakeholders at the global level and at the country level in Nigeria. The interview data were coded and analysed to create causal loop diagrams that resulted in a qualitative model of the global NTD system.

resultsThe complete qualitative model is discussed and presented visually as six separate sub-components that highlight key forces and feedback loops within the global NTD system.

conclusionsWe identified five leverage points for NTD system change, namely (1) clarify the potential for and assess realistic progress towards NTD elimination, (2) increase support for interventions besides drug delivery, (3) reduce dependency on international donors, (4) create a less insular culture within the global NTD community, and (5) systemically address the issue of health worker incentives. The specific findings for NTDs raise a number of uncomfortable questions that have not been addressed, at least in part, because it is easier to continue focusing on 'quick win' solutions. The study provides a model of a systems thinking approach that can be applied to other complex global health and development challenges in order to understand complexity and identify leverage points for system change.

Indexed as

Global HealthPublic HealthSystems AnalysisTropical MedicineCultureDisease EradicationHealth PersonnelHumansMotivationNeglected DiseasesNigeriaProgram EvaluationThinkingcausal loop diagramsglobal healthneglected tropical diseasespublic healthsystems changesystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID32493485
PMCPMC7268457
OpenAlexW3029407036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.