Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493483›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020

Automatic group-wise whole-brain short association fiber bundle labeling based on clustering and cortical surface information.

Andrea Vázquez, Narciso López-López, Josselin Houenou, Cyril Poupon, Jean-François Mangin, Susana Ladra, Pamela Guevara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea VázquezFaculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Narciso López-LópezFaculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Josselin HouenouNeuroSpin, CEA, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Cyril PouponNeuroSpin, CEA, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Jean-François ManginNeuroSpin, CEA, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Susana LadraCentro de investigación CITIC, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Pamela GuevaraFaculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile. pamela.guevara@biomedica.udec.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9988-400X

Funding

ANID 1190701ANID 2016-21160342ANID ACT172121ANID FB0008Horizon 2020 604102Horizon 2020 690941Horizon 2020 785907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion MRI is the preferred non-invasive in vivo modality for the study of brain white matter connections. Tractography datasets contain 3D streamlines that can be analyzed to study the main brain white matter tracts. Fiber clustering methods have been used to automatically group similar fibers into clusters. However, due to inter-subject variability and artifacts, the resulting clusters are difficult to process for finding common connections across subjects, specially for superficial white matter.

methodsWe present an automatic method for labeling of short association bundles on a group of subjects. The method is based on an intra-subject fiber clustering that generates compact fiber clusters. Posteriorly, the clusters are labeled based on the cortical connectivity of the fibers, taking as reference the Desikan-Killiany atlas, and named according to their relative position along one axis. Finally, two different strategies were applied and compared for the labeling of inter-subject bundles: a matching with the Hungarian algorithm, and a well-known fiber clustering algorithm, called QuickBundles.

resultsIndividual labeling was executed over four subjects, with an execution time of 3.6 min. An inspection of individual labeling based on a distance measure showed good correspondence among the four tested subjects. Two inter-subject labeling were successfully implemented and applied to 20 subjects and compared using a set of distance thresholds, ranging from a conservative value of 10 mm to a moderate value of 21 mm. Hungarian algorithm led to a high correspondence, but low reproducibility for all the thresholds, with 96 s of execution time. QuickBundles led to better correspondence, reproducibility and short execution time of 9 s. Hence, the whole processing for the inter-subject labeling over 20 subjects takes 1.17 h.

conclusionWe implemented a method for the automatic labeling of short bundles in individuals, based on an intra-subject clustering and the connectivity of the clusters with the cortex. The labels provide useful information for the visualization and analysis of individual connections, which is very difficult without any additional information. Furthermore, we provide two fast inter-subject bundle labeling methods. The obtained clusters could be used for performing manual or automatic connectivity analysis in individuals or across subjects.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAutomationBrainCluster AnalysisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedClusteringFiber bundleFiber labelingSuperficial white matterTractography

Identifiers

PMID32493483
PMCPMC7268230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.