Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493357›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

Key factors for national spread and scale-up of an eConsult innovation.

Isabella Moroz, Douglas Archibald, Mylaine Breton, Elizabeth Cote-Boileau, Lois Crowe, Tanya Horsley, Lirjie Hyseni, Gina Johar, Erin Keely, Katharina Kovacs Burns and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Isabella MorozC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Douglas ArchibaldC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Mylaine BretonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Elizabeth Cote-BoileauFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Research, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Lois CroweC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Tanya HorsleyRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Lirjie HysenieHealth Centre of Excellence, Waterloo, Canada.
Gina JoharSouth East Local Health Integration Network, Belleville, Canada.
Erin KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Katharina Kovacs BurnsAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
Craig KuziemskyMacEwan University, Edmonton, Canada.
Jim LaplanteCare Partner, Ottawa, Canada.
Ariana MihanC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Luis OppenheimerDepartment of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Don SturgeCentral Health, Gander, Canada.
Delphine S TuotDivision of Nephrology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States of America.
Clare LiddyC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. cliddy@bruyere.org.

Funding

CIHR Health System Improvement Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding healthcare innovations from the local to national level is a complex pursuit requiring careful assessment of all relevant factors. In this study (a component of a larger eConsult programme of research), we aimed to identify the key factors involved in the spread and scale-up of a successful regional eConsult model across Canada.

methodsWe conducted a constant comparative thematic analysis of stakeholder discussions captured during a full-day National eConsult Forum meeting held in Ottawa, Canada, on 11 December 2017. Sixty-four participants attended, representing provincial and territorial governments, national organisations, healthcare providers, researchers and patients. Proceedings were recorded, transcribed and underwent qualitative analysis using the Framework for Applied Policy Research.

resultsThis study identified four main themes that were critical to support the intentional efforts to spread and scale-up eConsult across Canada, namely (1) identifying population care needs and access problems, (2) engaging stakeholders who were willing to roll up their sleeves and take action, (3) building on current strategies and policies, and (4) measuring and communicating outcomes.

conclusionsEfforts to promote innovation in healthcare are more likely to succeed if they are based on an understanding of the forces that drive the spread and scale-up of innovation. Further research is needed to develop and strengthen the conceptual and applied foundations of the spread and scale-up of healthcare innovations, especially in the context of emergent learning health systems across Canada and beyond.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationHealth Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareTelemedicineCanadaCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansReferral and ConsultationResearchStakeholder ParticipationeConsultelectronic consultationInnovationpolicyspread and scale-up

Identifiers

PMID32493357
PMCPMC7268606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.