Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493355›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2020

An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola).

Alexandros Vasilikopoulos, Bernhard Misof, Karen Meusemann, Doria Lieberz, Tomáš Flouri, Rolf G Beutel, Oliver Niehuis, Torsten Wappler, Jes Rust, Ralph S Peters and 13 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Female Germline Cysts in Animals: Evolution and Function.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Alexandros VasilikopoulosCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany. alexvasilikop@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-0112
Bernhard MisofCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany. b.misof@leibniz-zfmk.de.
Karen MeusemannCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Doria LieberzCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Tomáš FlouriDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Rolf G BeutelInstitut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Oliver NiehuisDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute of Biology I (Zoology), Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1849
Torsten WapplerNatural History Department, Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, 64283, Darmstadt, Germany.
Jes RustSteinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Ralph S PetersCentre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander DonathCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Lars PodsiadlowskiCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph MayerCentre for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Daniela BartelDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander BöhmDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Shanlin LiuDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Paschalia KapliDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Carola GreveLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325, Frankfurt, Germany.
James E JepsonSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, T23 N73K, Cork, Ireland.
Xingyue LiuDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, 100193, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Horst AspöckInstitute of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical Parasitology, Medical University of Vienna (MUW), 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ulrike AspöckDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31672322National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe latest advancements in DNA sequencing technologies have facilitated the resolution of the phylogeny of insects, yet parts of the tree of Holometabola remain unresolved. The phylogeny of Neuropterida has been extensively studied, but no strong consensus exists concerning the phylogenetic relationships within the order Neuroptera. Here, we assembled a novel transcriptomic dataset to address previously unresolved issues in the phylogeny of Neuropterida and to infer divergence times within the group. We tested the robustness of our phylogenetic estimates by comparing summary coalescent and concatenation-based phylogenetic approaches and by employing different quartet-based measures of phylogenomic incongruence, combined with data permutations.

resultsOur results suggest that the order Raphidioptera is sister to Neuroptera + Megaloptera. Coniopterygidae is inferred as sister to all remaining neuropteran families suggesting that larval cryptonephry could be a ground plan feature of Neuroptera. A clade that includes Nevrorthidae, Osmylidae, and Sisyridae (i.e. Osmyloidea) is inferred as sister to all other Neuroptera except Coniopterygidae, and Dilaridae is placed as sister to all remaining neuropteran families. Ithonidae is inferred as the sister group of monophyletic Myrmeleontiformia. The phylogenetic affinities of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae were dependent on the data type analyzed, and quartet-based analyses showed only weak support for the placement of Hemerobiidae as sister to Ithonidae + Myrmeleontiformia. Our molecular dating analyses suggest that most families of Neuropterida started to diversify in the Jurassic and our ancestral character state reconstructions suggest a primarily terrestrial environment of the larvae of Neuropterida and Neuroptera.

conclusionOur extensive phylogenomic analyses consolidate several key aspects in the backbone phylogeny of Neuropterida, such as the basal placement of Coniopterygidae within Neuroptera and the monophyly of Osmyloidea. Furthermore, they provide new insights into the timing of diversification of Neuropterida. Despite the vast amount of analyzed molecular data, we found that certain nodes in the tree of Neuroptera are not robustly resolved. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of integrating the results of morphological analyses with those of sequence-based phylogenomics. We also suggest that comparative analyses of genomic meta-characters should be incorporated into future phylogenomic studies of Neuropterida.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceGenomicsHolometabolaLarvaSequence Analysis, DNATranscriptomeEndopterygotaFour-cluster likelihood mappingMegalopteraMulti-species coalescentNeuropteraRaphidiopteraRNA-seqSupermatricesTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32493355
PMCPMC7268685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.