Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493326›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Development of a personal heat strain risk assessment (PHSRA) index in workplaces and its validation.

Saeid Yazdanirad, Farideh Golbabaei, Mohammad Reza Monazzam, Habibollah Dehghan, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saeid YazdaniradDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-6637
Farideh GolbabaeiDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. fgolbabaei@tums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-4923
Mohammad Reza MonazzamDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Habibollah DehghanDepartment of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abbas Rahimi ForoushaniDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 9421138003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is not a comprehensive heat stress index to screen the people susceptible to heat disorders and illnesses in hot workplaces. The present study was aimed to develop a personal heat strain risk assessment (PHSRA) index in workplaces and validate it.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out on 201 Iranian male employees under various thermal conditions. At first, the demographical data of participants were gathered. After that, the heart rate and tympanic temperature of the subjects were carefully measured at times of 30, 60, and 90 min of starting the work. Environmental factors were measured simultaneously. The metabolism rate and insulation value of clothes were also estimated. At the end, a novel index of the heat strain was developed using structural equation modeling in AMOS and validated using linear regression analysis in SPSS.

resultsIndirect effect coefficients of personal factors including age, body mass index, maximum aerobic capacity, and body surface area were equal to 0.031, 0.145, - 0.064, and 0.106, respectively. The coefficients of main factors including dry temperature, wet temperature, globe temperature, wind speed, metabolism, and clothing thermal insulation were obtained as 0.739, 0.688, 0.765, 0.245, 0.482, and 0.383, respectively. These coefficients and normalized values of the factors were used to develop a novel index. The total score of the index was categorized into four levels by optimal cut-off points of 12.93, 16.48, and 18.87. Based on the results of regression analysis, this index justifies 77% of the tympanic temperature as a dependent variable (R

conclusionsIn general, the results indicated that the novel index developed by the personal and main factors had proper validity in the prediction of thermal strain.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsAdultBody TemperatureCross-Sectional StudiesHeart RateHeat Stress DisordersHot TemperatureHumansIranLatent Class AnalysisLinear ModelsMaleOccupational DiseasesReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentHeat stressMain factorsPersonal factorsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32493326
PMCPMC7268248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.