Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493318›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2020

Impact of take-home messages written into slide presentations delivered during lectures on the retention of messages and the residents' knowledge: a randomized controlled study.

Alexandre Lautrette, Alexandre Boyer, Didier Gruson, Laurent Argaud, Carole Schwebel, Bernard Tardy, Philippe Vignon, Bruno Megarbane, Pierre Schoeffler, Pascal Chabrot and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01795651 (Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01795651 completednot on this map

Identification of Take Home Message in Lecture Based Learning: a Randomize Controlled Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2013 to 2013Enrolled77ConditionsEducational Modules Given to French Juniors Taking the Postgraduate Critical Care DiplomaArmsidentification of take-home message of lecture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Alexandre LautretteIntensive Care Medicine, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France. alautrette@chu-clermontferrand.fr.
Alexandre BoyerIntensive Care Unit, Pellegrin-Tripode Hospital, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Didier GrusonIntensive Care Unit, Pellegrin-Tripode Hospital, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Laurent ArgaudIntensive Care Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Carole SchwebelIntensive Care Unit, Albert Michallon Hospital, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Bernard TardyClinical Investigation Center-CIC 1408, Nord Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Philippe VignonMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Dupuytren Hospital, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France.
Bruno MegarbaneDepartment of Medical and Toxicological Critical Care, Lariboisière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, INSERM UMRS-1144, Paris-Diderot University, Paris, France.
Pierre SchoefflerIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pascal ChabrotDepartment of Radiology, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jeannot SchmidtAdult Emergency Department, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yves BoirieNutrition Unit, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Claude GuerinIntensive Care Unit, Croix Rousse Hospital, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Michaël DarmonIntensive Care Unit, Nord Teaching Hospital, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Kada KloucheIntensive Care Unit, Lapeyronie Hospital, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Bertrand SouweineLMGE «Laboratoire Micro-organismes: Génome et Environnement», UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont-Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jean DellamonicaIntensive Care Unit, l'Archet Hospital, Cote d'Azur University, Nice, France.
Bruno PereiraBiostatistics unit, Delegation à la Recherche Clinique (DRCI), University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
TREX group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLectures with slide presentations are widely used to teach evidence-based medicine to large groups. Take-home messages (THMs) are poorly identified and recollected by students. We investigated whether an instruction to list THMs in written form on slides would improve the retention thereof by residents, and the residents' level of knowledge, 1 month after lectures.

methodsProspective blinded randomized controlled study was conducted. Twelve lectures (6 control and 6 intervention lectures) were delivered to 73 residents. For the intervention lectures, the lecturers were instructed to incorporate clear written THMs into their slide presentations. The outcomes were ability of resident to recollect THMs delivered during a lecture (as assessed by accordance rate between the lecturers' and residents' THMs) and knowledge (as assessed by multiple choice questions (MCQs)).

resultsData for 3738 residents' THMs and 3410 MCQs were analyzed. The intervention did not significantly increase the number of THMs written on slides (77% (n = 20/26), 95% CI 56-91 vs 64% (n = 18/28), 95% CI 44-81, p = 0.31) nor THMs retention (13% (n = 238/1791), 95% CI 12-15 vs 17% (n = 326/1947), 95% 15-18, p = 0.40) nor knowledge (63.8 ± 26.2 vs 61.1 ± 31.4 /100 points, p = 0.75). In multivariable analyses performed with all THMs written on slides from the two groups, a superior knowledge was associated with notetaking during lectures (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.51) and THMs retention (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.54-3.04); and THMs retention was associated with written THMs (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.20-3.93).

conclusionsIn lectures delivered to residents, a third of the THMs were not in written form. An intervention based on an explicit instruction to lecturers to provide THMs in written form in their slide presentations did not result in increased use of written THMs into the slide presentation or improvement of the THMs retention or level of knowledge. However, we showed that there was a strong positive association between writing THMs on a slide, retention of THMs and residents' knowledge. Further researches are needed to assess interventions to increase written THMs in lectures by faculty.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01795651 (Fev 21, 2013).

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyLearningRetention, PsychologyTeachingAdultCritical CareEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodKnowledgeLectureMedical educationResidentTake-home message

Identifiers

PMID32493318
PMCPMC7271544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.