ArticleBMC health services research2020
Estimating the costs of genomic sequencing in cancer control.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review.Advances in therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular classification and precision therapy in gastric cancer: Current advances and future perspectives (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Implementing whole genome and transcriptome sequencing for cancer patients in routine healthcare: a comprehensive guide to costing.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- The cost and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing: a systematic literature review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Micro-costing of genetic and genomic testing in oncology: a systematic review of laboratory resources and costs.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Multi-Institutional Modified Delphi For Genomics in Expert Consensus Survey of Genomic Testing for Anterior Skull Base Malignancies.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Solving Riddles Through Sequencing (SIRIUS): unlocking hematologic diagnoses by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Microcosting Study of Genomic Profiling for Precision Cancer Medicine: Application from the National Infrastructure for Precision Diagnostics in Norway.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
- Detecting likely germline variants during tumor-based molecular profiling.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Development of a Clinically Applicable High-Resolution Assay for Sperm Mosaicism.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
- Exploratory Cost-Utility Analysis of a 37-Gene Panel Versus Usual Care to Guide Therapy for Patients with Intermediate-Risk Myeloid Malignancies.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- The Potential Use of Digital Twin Technology for Advancing CAR-T Cell Therapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Costs of biomarker testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a global study comparing next-generation sequencing and single-gene testing.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2025Observational
- Sudden Cardiac Death: The Role of Molecular Autopsy with Next-Generation Sequencing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How Have Massively Parallel Sequencing Technologies Furthered Our Understanding of Oncogenesis and Cancer Progression?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- A micro-costing study of mass-spectrometry based quantitative proteomics testing applied to the diagnostic pipeline of mitochondrial and other rare disorders.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- The economic costs of precision medicine for clinical translational research among children with high-risk cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Applications of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma B Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the rapid uptake of genomic technologies within cancer care, few studies provide detailed information on the costs of sequencing across different applications. The objective of the study was to examine and categorise the complete costs involved in genomic sequencing for a range of applications within cancer settings.
methodsWe performed a cost-analysis using gross and micro-costing approaches for genomic sequencing performed during 2017/2018 across different settings in Brisbane, Australia. Sequencing was undertaken for patients with lung, breast, oesophageal cancers, melanoma or mesothelioma. Aggregated resource data were captured for a total of 1433 patients and point estimates of per patient costs were generated. Deterministic sensitivity analyses addressed the uncertainty in the estimates. Estimated costs to the public health system for resources were categorised into seven distinct activities in the sequencing process: sampling, extraction, library preparation, sequencing, analysis, data storage and clinical reporting. Costs were also aggregated according to labour, consumables, testing, equipment and 'other' categories.
resultsThe per person costs were AU$347-429 (2018 US$240-297) for targeted panels, AU$871-$2788 (2018 US$604-1932) for exome sequencing, and AU$2895-4830 (2018 US$2006-3347) for whole genome sequencing. Cost proportions were highest for library preparation/sequencing materials (average 76.8% of total costs), sample extraction (8.1%), data analysis (9.2%) and data storage (2.6%). Capital costs for the sequencers were an additional AU$34-197 (2018 US$24-67) per person.
conclusionsTotal costs were most sensitive to consumables and sequencing activities driven by commercial prices. Per person sequencing costs for cancer are high when tumour/blood pairs require testing. Using the natural steps involved in sequencing and categorising resources accordingly, future evaluations of costs or cost-effectiveness of clinical genomics across cancer projects could be more standardised and facilitate easier comparison of cost drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.