Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493265›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2020

The influence of demographic characteristics on constipation symptoms: a detailed overview.

Sanne J Verkuijl, Rob J Meinds, Monika Trzpis, Paul M A Broens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the Effect ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Consensus Guidelines on Constipation in Adults in Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanne J VerkuijlDepartment of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. s.j.verkuijl@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-7941
Rob J MeindsDepartment of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Monika TrzpisDepartment of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Paul M A BroensDepartment of Surgery, Anorectal Physiology Laboratory, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosing constipation remains difficult and its treatment continues to be ineffective. The reason may be that the symptom patterns of constipation differ in different demographic groups. We aimed to determine the pattern of constipation symptoms in different demographic groups and to define the symptoms that best indicate constipation.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study the Groningen Defecation and Fecal Continence questionnaire was completed by a representative sample of the adult Dutch population (N = 892). We diagnosed constipation according to the Rome IV criteria for constipation.

resultsThe Rome criteria were fulfilled by 15.6% of the study group and we found the highest prevalence of constipation in women and young adults (19.7 and 23.5%, respectively). Symptom patterns differed significantly between constipated respondents of various ages, while we did not observe sex-based differences. Finally, we found a range of constipation symptoms, not included in the Rome IV criteria, that showed marked differences in prevalence between constipated and non-constipated individuals, especially failure to defecate (∆ = 41.2%).

conclusionsPrimarily, we found that certain symptoms of constipation are age-dependent. Moreover, we emphasize that symptoms of constipation not included in the Rome IV criteria, such as daily failure to defecate and an average duration of straining of more than five minutes, are also reliable indicators of constipation. Therefore, we encourage clinicians to adopt a more comprehensive approach to diagnosing constipation.

Indexed as

DemographyHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsConstipationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrevalenceSex FactorsConstipationDemographic factorsDiagnostic procedureDigestive symptoms

Identifiers

PMID32493265
PMCPMC7268616
OpenAlexW3032194941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.