Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32493233›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2020

Similar response rates and survival with PARP inhibitors for patients with solid tumors harboring somatic versus Germline BRCA mutations: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Muhammad Aziz, Alec Britt, Lee Wade, Weijing Sun, Joaquina Baranda, Raed Al-Rajabi, Anwaar Saeed, Anup Kasi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genomic Predictive Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. DNA damage targeted therapy for advanced breast cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ghulam Rehman MohyuddinUniversity of Kansas, Kansas City, USA.
Muhammad AzizDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, USA.
Alec BrittDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, USA.
Lee WadeUniversity of Toledo Libraries, Toledo, USA.
Weijing SunDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA.
Joaquina BarandaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA.
Raed Al-RajabiDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA.
Anwaar SaeedDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA.
Anup KasiDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, USA. akasi@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-5701
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPARP inhibitors (PARPi) have recently been approved for various malignancies based on the results of several clinical trials. However, these trials have mostly recruited patients with germline BRCA mutations, and it is unclear whether PARPi have similar efficacy in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of PARPi in patients with somatic BRCA mutations.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis comparing overall response rate to PARPi in patients harboring somatic versus germline BRCA mutations. We looked at studies including somatic and germline mutations in BRCA patients that received PARPi.

resultsAfter screening and removing duplicates, 18 studies met our criteria for including both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Only 8 studies reported response rates for both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. In those studies, 24 out of 43 patients with somatic BRCA mutations (55.8%), and 69 out of 157 (43.9%) patients with germline BRCA patients had a response to therapy to PARPi. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.399). In all five studies that reported progression-free survival, there was no obvious difference in outcomes between somatic versus germline BRCA patients, however a precise statistical analysis could not be performed.

conclusionOur meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature indicates similar response rates of PARPi therapy in patients with somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Investigation of use of PARPi therapy in a broader patient population, and the inclusion of somatic BRCA mutations in further clinical trials is paramount in improving therapeutic options for our patients.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGerm-Line MutationHumansNeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProgression-Free SurvivalBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBRCAGermlineMeta-analysisPARP inhibitorsSomatic

Identifiers

PMID32493233
PMCPMC7267765
OpenAlexW3032612118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.