ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
An empirical Bayes approach to normalization and differential abundance testing for microbiome data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Chronic Thermal Stress on the Physiology, Metabolism, Histology, and Gut Microbiota of JuvenileAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Glyphosate and phosphate treatments in soil differentially affect crop microbiomes depending on species, tissue and growth stage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Rusa deer microbiota: the importance of preliminary data analysis for meaningful diversity comparisons.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- piCRISPR: Physically informed deep learning models for CRISPR/Cas9 off-target cleavage prediction.Artificial intelligence in the life sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Investigating differential abundance methods in microbiome data: A benchmark study.PLoS computational biology · 2022Review
- A comprehensive evaluation of microbial differential abundance analysis methods: current status and potential solutions.Microbiome · 2022Article
- phyloMDA: an R package for phylogeny-aware microbiome data analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A maximum-type microbial differential abundance test with application to high-dimensional microbiome data analyses.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in DNA sequencing have offered researchers an unprecedented opportunity to better study the variety of species living in and on the human body. However, the analysis of microbiome data is complicated by several challenges. First, the sequencing depth may vary by orders of magnitude across samples. Second, species are rare and the data often contain many zeros. Third, the specimen is a fraction of the microbial ecosystem, and so the data are compositional carrying only relative information. Other characteristics of microbiome data include pronounced over-dispersion in taxon abundances, and the existence of a phylogenetic tree that relates all bacterial species. To address some of these challenges, microbiome analysis workflows often normalize the read counts prior to downstream analysis. However, there are limitations in the current literature on the normalization of microbiome data.
resultsUnder the multinomial distribution for the read counts and a prior for the unknown proportions, we propose an empirical Bayes approach to microbiome data normalization. Using a tree-based extension of the Dirichlet prior, we further extend our method by incorporating the phylogenetic tree into the normalization process. We study the impact of normalization on differential abundance analysis. In the presence of tree structure, we propose a phylogeny-aware detection procedure.
conclusionsExtensive simulations and gut microbiome data applications are conducted to demonstrate the superior performance of our empirical Bayes method over other normalization methods, and over commonly-used methods for differential abundance testing. Original R scripts are available at GitHub (https://github.com/liudoubletian/eBay).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.