Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492884›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Short-Term Effects of PENS versus Dry Needling in Subjects with Unilateral Mechanical Neck Pain and Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Levator Scapulae Muscle: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Santiago Garcia-de-Miguel, Daniel Pecos-Martin, Tamara Larroca-Sanz, Beatriz Sanz-de-Vicente, Laura Garcia-Montes, Ruben Fernandez-Matias, Tomas Gallego-Izquierdo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06459804 (Effects of Electro Dry Needling Versus Dry Needling on Pain, Muscle Strength, and Range of Motion in Patients With Levator Scapulae Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06459804 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Electro Dry Needling Versus Dry Needling on Pain, Muscle Strength, and Range of Motion in Patients With Levator Scapulae Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsNeck SyndromeArmsElectro Dry Needling, Dry Needling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago Garcia-de-MiguelPhysiotherapy and Pain Group, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Pecos-MartinPhysiotherapy and Pain Group, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-0998
Tamara Larroca-SanzDepartment of Plastic and Restorative Surgery, University Hospital QuironSalud Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz Sanz-de-VicenteCenter of Sports Medicine of the Agencia Española de Protección de la Salud en el Deporte, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Laura Garcia-MontesDepartment of Physical Therapy, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Ruben Fernandez-MatiasResearch Institute of Physiotherapy and Pain, University of Alcala, 28805 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-7264
Tomas Gallego-IzquierdoPhysiotherapy and Pain Group, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procedures such as dry needling (DN) or percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) are commonly proposed for the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrP). The aim of the present study is to investigate if PENS is more effective than DN in the short term in subjects with mechanical neck pain. This was an evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial. Subjects were recruited through announcements and randomly allocated into DN or PENS groups. Pain intensity, disability, pressure pain threshold (PPT), range of motion (ROM), and side-bending strength were measured. The analyses included mixed-model analyses of variance and pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. The final sample was composed of 44 subjects (22 per group). Both groups showed improvements in pain intensity (η

Indexed as

dry needlingmyofascial trigger pointneck painPENSphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32492884
PMCPMC7355914
OpenAlexW3031542737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.