Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492791›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Variability in the Method of Gastrostomy Placement in Children.

Jose H Salazar, Charles Spanbauer, Manu R Sood, John C Densmore, Kyle J Van Arendonk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose H SalazarDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Charles SpanbauerDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Manu R SoodDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2887-0115
John C DensmoreDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Kyle J Van ArendonkDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-0881
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although gastrostomy placement is one of the most common procedures performed in children, the optimal technique remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variability in the method of gastrostomy tube placement in children in the United States. Patients <18 years old undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or surgical gastrostomy (SG) (including open or laparoscopic) from 1997 to 2012 were identified using the Kids' Inpatient Database. Method of gastrostomy placement was evaluated using a multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept term and a patient-age random-effect term. A total of 67,811 gastrostomy placements were performed during the study period. PEG was used in 36.6% of entries overall and was generally consistent over time. PEG placement was less commonly performed in infants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95%CI 0.26-0.33), children at urban hospitals (aOR: 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.82), and children cared for at children's hospitals (aOR 0.57, 95%CI 0.48-0.69) and was more commonly performed in children with private insurance (aOR 1.17, 95%CI 1.09-1.25). Dramatic variability in PEG use was identified between centers, ranging from 0% to 100%. The random intercept and slope terms significantly improved the model, confirming significant center-level variability and increased variability among patients <1 year old. These findings emphasize the need to further evaluate the safest method of gastrostomy placement in children, in particular among the youngest patients in whom practice varies the most.

Indexed as

childrengastrostomytechniquevariability

Identifiers

PMID32492791
PMCPMC7346129
OpenAlexW3029096105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.