ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Variability in the Method of Gastrostomy Placement in Children.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Gastrostomy-Related Procedures in Polish Children: A Longitudinal Nationwide Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Gastrostomy in Children: A 5-Year Single Tertiary Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Pediatric laparoscopic versus percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement: a single-center review.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Review
- Nationwide Survey for Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- A pilot study to determine the incidence, type, and severity of non-routine events in neonates undergoing gastrostomy tube placement.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2022Article
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes Can Be Considered Safe in Children: A Single-Center 11-Year Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although gastrostomy placement is one of the most common procedures performed in children, the optimal technique remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate variability in the method of gastrostomy tube placement in children in the United States. Patients <18 years old undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or surgical gastrostomy (SG) (including open or laparoscopic) from 1997 to 2012 were identified using the Kids' Inpatient Database. Method of gastrostomy placement was evaluated using a multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model with a random intercept term and a patient-age random-effect term. A total of 67,811 gastrostomy placements were performed during the study period. PEG was used in 36.6% of entries overall and was generally consistent over time. PEG placement was less commonly performed in infants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95%CI 0.26-0.33), children at urban hospitals (aOR: 0.38, 95%CI 0.18-0.82), and children cared for at children's hospitals (aOR 0.57, 95%CI 0.48-0.69) and was more commonly performed in children with private insurance (aOR 1.17, 95%CI 1.09-1.25). Dramatic variability in PEG use was identified between centers, ranging from 0% to 100%. The random intercept and slope terms significantly improved the model, confirming significant center-level variability and increased variability among patients <1 year old. These findings emphasize the need to further evaluate the safest method of gastrostomy placement in children, in particular among the youngest patients in whom practice varies the most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.