Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492784›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Perspective-Taking: In Search of a Theory.

Geoff G Cole, Abbie C Millett, Steven Samuel, Madeline J Eacott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. It's Not You, It's Me: A Review of Individual Differences in Visuospatial Perspective Taking.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Geoff G ColeCentre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Abbie C MillettSchool of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1382-9240
Steven SamuelCentre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7776-7427
Madeline J EacottCentre for Brain Science, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perspective-taking has been one of the central concerns of work on social attention and developmental psychology for the past 60 years. Despite its prominence, there is no formal description of what it means to represent another's viewpoint. The present article argues that such a description is now required in the form of theory-a theory that should address a number of issues that are central to the notion of assuming another's viewpoint. After suggesting that the mental imagery debate provides a good framework for understanding some of the issues and problems surrounding perspective-taking, we set out nine points that we believe any theory of perspective-taking should consider.

Indexed as

gaze cueingmental imageryperspective-takingsocial attentionvision

Identifiers

PMID32492784
PMCPMC7355554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.