Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492775›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Effects of Nanoparticle Size and Radiation Energy on Copper-Cysteamine Nanoparticles for X-ray Induced Photodynamic Therapy.

Bindeshwar Sah, Jing Wu, Adam Vanasse, Nil Kanatha Pandey, Lalit Chudal, Zhenzhen Huang, Wenzhi Song, Hongmei Yu, Lun Ma, Wei Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in copper homeostasis-involved tumor theranostics.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bindeshwar SahDepartment of Physics, University of Rhode Island, 2 Lippitt Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Jing WuDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, 9 Greenhouse Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Adam VanasseDepartment of Physics, University of Rhode Island, 2 Lippitt Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Nil Kanatha PandeyDepartment of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Lalit ChudalDepartment of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Zhenzhen HuangCollege of Chemistry and Department of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Wenzhi SongCollege of Chemistry and Department of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Hongmei YuSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China.
Lun MaDepartment of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-9830
Michael P AntoshDepartment of Physics, University of Rhode Island, 2 Lippitt Road, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
The University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USJilin University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology Liaoning · CN

Funding

Training CoreP20GM103430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Bongsup P Cho · 2012 to 2026
$63.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Copper-cysteamine (Cu-Cy) nanoparticle is a novel sensitizer with a potential to increase the effectiveness of radiation therapy for cancer treatment. In this work, the effect of nanoparticle size and the energy of X-rays on the effectiveness of radiation therapy are investigated. The effect of the particle size on their performance is very complicated. The nanoparticles with an average size of 300 nm have the most intense photoluminescence, the nanoparticles with the average size of 100 nm have the most reactive oxygen species production upon X-ray irradiation, while the nanoparticles with the average size of 40 nm have the best outcome in the tumor suppression in mice upon X-ray irradiation. For energy, 90 kVp radiation resulted in smaller tumor sizes than 250 kVp or 350 kVp radiation energies. Overall, knowledge of the effect of nanoparticle size and radiation energy on radiation therapy outcomes could be useful for future applications of Cu-Cy nanoparticles.

Indexed as

copper-cysteamine nanoparticlemicephotodynamic therapyradiation energiesreactive oxygen speciessizetumorX-ray

Identifiers

PMID32492775
PMCPMC7353381
OpenAlexW3028604091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.