Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492633›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2020

Association of heterogeneous MYCN amplification with clinical features, biological characteristics and outcomes in neuroblastoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Kevin Campbell, Arlene Naranjo, Emily Hibbitts, Julie M Gastier-Foster, Rochelle Bagatell, Meredith S Irwin, Hiroyuki Shimada, Michael Hogarty, Julie R Park, Steven G DuBois

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Revista de neurologia · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CT-based morphologic and radiomics features for the classification of MYCN gene amplification status in pediatric neuroblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. TargetingFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin CampbellDana-Farber / Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Arlene NaranjoChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Emily HibbittsChildren's Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Julie M Gastier-FosterInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rochelle BagatellDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Meredith S IrwinDepartment of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Hiroyuki ShimadaDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, USA.
Michael HogartyDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Julie R ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Steven G DuBoisDana-Farber / Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: steven_dubois@dfci.harvard.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Oncology Group · USHarvard University · USHospital for Sick Children · CANationwide Children's Hospital · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Research Training in Pediatric OncologyT32CA136432 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SCOTT A ARMSTRONG · 2009 to 2026
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA136432NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMYCN amplification (MNA) is associated with poor outcomes in neuroblastoma. Less is known about heterogeneous MNA within a tumour. We compared clinical characteristics, biologic features and clinical outcomes of patients with heterogeneous MNA to patients with either homogeneous MNA or MYCN wild-type tumours. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we categorized patients as having tumours with MYCN wild-type, homogeneous MNA (>20% amplified tumour cells) or heterogeneous MNA (≤20% amplified tumour cells). We used chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests to compare features between groups. We used log-rank tests and Cox models to compare event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups.

resultsMYCN status and heterogeneity status (if amplified) could be ascertained in diagnostic tumour samples from 5975 patients, including 57 (1%) with heterogeneous MNA, 981 (16.4%) with homogeneous MNA, and 4937 (82.6%) with MYCN wild-type tumours. Multiple clinical and biological features differed between patients with heterogeneous vs. homogeneous MNA, including enrichment for thoracic primary sites and paucity of 1p loss of heterozygosity with heterogeneous MNA (p < 0.0001). Importantly, EFS and OS were not significantly different between patients with heterogeneous vs. homogeneous MNA. Further, EFS and OS for patients with heterogeneous MNA were significantly inferior to patients with wild-type MYCN.

conclusionAlthough neuroblastomas with heterogeneous MNA demonstrate significantly different biological and clinical patterns compared with homogeneous MNA, prognosis is similar between the two groups. These results support current practice that treats patients with heterogeneous MNA similarly to patients with homogeneous MNA.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic HeterogeneityHumansInfantMaleNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinAmplificationHeterogeneityMYCNNeuroblastomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32492633
PMCPMC7295664
OpenAlexW3032372859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.