Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492620›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2020

Molecular Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of EGFR Exon 19 C-Helix Deletion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Response to EGFR TKIs.

Chun-Wei Xu, Lei Lei, Wen-Xian Wang, Li Lin, You-Cai Zhu, Hong Wang, Li-Yun Miao, Li-Ping Wang, Wu Zhuang, Mei-Yu Fang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Novel Co-Occurrence of GermlineInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolving landscape of first-line and subsequent therapies inExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Wei XuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, People's Republic of China.
Lei LeiDepartment of Chemotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Xian WangDepartment of Chemotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.
Li LinDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, People's Republic of China.
You-Cai ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Disease Center, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314000, People's Republic of China.
Hong WangDepartment of Lung Cancer, The Fifth Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100071, People's Republic of China.
Li-Yun MiaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210008, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: liyunmiao462@163.com.
Li-Ping WangDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014000, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: 215974914@qq.com.
Wu ZhuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian 350014, People's Republic of China.
Mei-Yu FangDepartment of Chemotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, People's Republic of China.
Tang-Feng LvDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, People's Republic of China.
Yong SongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: yong_song6310@yahoo.com.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNNanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNanjing University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (E19del) is the most common activating mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and associates with the sensitivity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. However, not all mutant patterns of E19del have been well studied for the limited coverage of regular EGFR mutation testing. Here, we performed a retrospective cohort study of the C-helix E19del in advanced NSCLC patients based on the screening data by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. From May 2012 to December 2019, clinical information and specimen from 7544 consecutive advanced (IIIB/IV) NSCLC patients were collected and screened for EGFR gene mutations by NGS from multicenters in China. The molecular characteristics and responsiveness to first-line EGFR TKIs therapy in NSCLC patients with C-helix E19del were analyzed. The clinical characteristics were also compared between patients with classical E19del and C-helix E19del. Thirty-eight (2.6%) patients with C-helix E19del and 1400 (97.4%) patients with classical E19dels were identified from 1438 patients with E19del. No significant difference in clinical characteristics was observed between the C-helix E19del and classical E19del groups (P > .05), except for histology (P < .001). All 22 patients with C-helix E19del as p.S752_I759del, p.A750_E758del, p.A750_E758delinsP, p.T751_A755delinsNY, p.T751_I759delinsG, p.T751_I759delinsLD, p.T751_I759delinsN, p.T751_L760delinsNL, and p.T751_D761delinsLY reached the best response as partial response rate (72.7%), and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months. The PFS after EGFR TKIs in patients with C-helix E19del tended to be longer than patients with classical E19del but has no statistical significance (12.0 months vs 8.5 months, P = .06). The C-helix E19del could be a positive biomarker for predicting response to EGFR TKIs in advanced NSCLC patients. NGS should be the appropriate platform to identify this rare population, especially when patients harbor no actionable driver mutation initially and are reluctant to accept chemotherapy as first-line therapy.

Identifiers

PMID32492620
PMCPMC7264750
OpenAlexW3031514951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.