Reply to Tuffet

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Assessing inspiratory drive and effort in critically ill patients at the bedside.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
   Review
2. Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: What is the future?Journal of intensive medicine · 2025
   Review
3. Combining OJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
   Review
4. Spontaneous Breathing and Evolving Phenotypes of Lung Damage in Patients with COVID-19: Review of Current Evidence and Forecast of a New Scenario.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
5. Control of Respiratory Drive by Noninvasive Ventilation as an Early Predictor of Success.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Early Inspiratory Effort Assessment by Esophageal Manometry Predicts Noninvasive Ventilation Outcome in2020

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as