Trial reportJAMA dermatology2020
Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03575871 (A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP, MULTI-CENTER STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PF-04965842 MONOTHERAPY IN SUBJECTS AGED 12 YEARS AND OLDER, WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 181 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pf-04965842 monotherapy in subjects aged 12 years and older, with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis
Who cites it
181 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale meta-analysis of infection risk with JAK-STAT inhibitors in 29,000 patients.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Pooled it
- JAK Inhibitors in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A 15,427-Patient Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Outcomes.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- A Model-Based Meta-Analysis Framework Quantifying Drivers of Placebo Response in Atopic Dermatitis Trials.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of treatments for atopic dermatitis: a model based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- The impact of abrocitinib treatment on lesion area and pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging treatments for dermatologic diseases in infants, children, and adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials on biologics and small molecule inhibitors.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Infection risk with JAK inhibitors in dermatoses: a meta-analysis.International journal of dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Upadacitinib and Dupilumab Demonstrate Superior Efficacy in the Treatment of Adolescent Atopic Dermatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Association of risk of incident acne and treatment with systemic Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023Pooled it
- Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Update of a Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA dermatology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of topical and systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis on pruritus: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaPooled it
- Long-term efficacy of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis to 2 years.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of SHR0302, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in Chinese patients with hepatic impairment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Trial
121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in a phase 3 monotherapy trial of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD in an identically designed trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial included patients 12 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD for at least 1 year and inadequate response to topical medications given for at least 4 weeks within 6 months. Patients were enrolled from 115 centers in Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Poland, United Kingdom, and the United States from June 29, 2018, to August 13, 2019. Data were analyzed from September 13 to October 25, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive once-daily oral abrocitinib in 200- or 100-mg doses or placebo for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary end points were the proportion of patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) response (ie, clear [0] or almost clear [1], with improvement of ≥2 grades) and the proportion of patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score (EASI-75) at week 12. Key secondary end points included the proportion of patients achieving a Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) response (ie, improvement of ≥4 points) at week 12. Other secondary end points included the proportion of patients achieving at least 90% improvement in EASI score (EASI-90). Safety was assessed via adverse events and laboratory monitoring. Results: A total of 391 patients (229 male [58.6%]; mean [SD] age, 35.1 [15.1] years) were included in the analysis; of these, 155 received abrocitinib, 200 mg/d; 158, abrocitinib, 100 mg/d; and 78, placebo. Among patients with available data at week 12, greater proportions of patients in the 200- and 100-mg abrocitinib groups vs the placebo group achieved IGA (59 of 155 [38.1%] and 44 of 155 [28.4%] vs 7 of 77 [9.1%]; P < .001) and EASI-75 (94 of 154 [61.0%] and 69 of 155 [44.5%] vs 8 of 77 [10.4%]; P < .001), greater estimated proportions achieved PP-NRS (55.3% [95% CI, 47.2%-63.5%] and 45.2% [95% CI, 37.1%-53.3%] vs 11.5% [95% CI, 4.1%-19.0%]; P < .001), and/or greater proportions achieved EASI-90 (58 of 154 [37.7%] and 37 of 155 [23.9%] vs 3 of 77 [3.9%]) responses. Adverse events were reported for 102 patients (65.8%) in the 200-mg group, 99 (62.7%) in the 100-mg group, and 42 (53.8%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events were reported for 2 patients (1.3%) in the 200-mg group, 5 (3.2%) in the 100-mg group, and 1 (1.3%) in the placebo group. Decreases in platelet count (2 [1.3%]) and laboratory values indicating thrombocytopenia (5 [3.2%]) were reported in the 200-mg group. Conclusions and Relevance: Monotherapy with once-daily oral abrocitinib was effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03575871.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.