Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492057›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Phenotypic responses of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) genotypes to phosphate supply under greenhouse and natural field conditions.

S Antony Ceasar, M Ramakrishnan, K K Vinod, G Victor Roch, Hari D Upadhyaya, Alison Baker, S Ignacimuthu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Improvement of millets in the post-genomic era.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Antony CeasarDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4106-1531
M RamakrishnanDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai, India.
K K VinodDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
G Victor RochDivision of Plant Biotechnology, Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai, India.
Hari D UpadhyayaThe University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
Alison BakerCentre for Plant Sciences, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
S IgnacimuthuXavier Research Foundation, St. Xavier's College, Palayamkottai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food insecurity is a looming threat for the burgeoning world population. Phosphorus (P), which is absorbed from soil as inorganic phosphate (Pi), is an essential macronutrient for the growth of all agricultural crops. This study reports phenotype analysis for P responses in natural field and greenhouse conditions, using 54 genotypes of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) representing wide geographic origins. The genotype responses were assessed in natural field conditions in two different seasons (monsoon and summer) under Pi-fertilized (P+) and unfertilized (P-) soil for eight above-ground traits. Enormous variations were seen among the genotypes in phenotypic responses for all the measured parameters under low P stress conditions. Variations were significant for plant height, leaf number and length, tillering ability and seed yield traits. Genotypes ISe 1234 and ISe 1541 were P+ responders, and the genotypes ISe 1181, ISe 1655, ISe 783 and ISe 1892 showed tolerance to low P for total seed yield. Genotypes that performed well under P- conditions were almost as productive as genotypes that performed well under P+ conditions suggesting some genotypes are well adapted to nutrient-poor soils. In the greenhouse, most of the genotypes produced changes in root architecture that are characteristic of P- stress, but to differing degrees. Significant variation was seen in root hair density and root hair number and in fresh and dry weight of shoot and root under P- stress. However, there was not much difference in the shoot and root total P and Pi levels of five selected high and low responding genotypes. We noticed contrasting responses in the greenhouse and natural field experiments for most of these genotypes. The leads from the study form the basis for breeding and improvement of foxtail millet for better Pi-use efficiency.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant BreedingCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenotypeMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPhosphatesPhylogenySetaria PlantSoilPhosphatesSoil

Identifiers

PMID32492057
PMCPMC7269269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.