Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492038›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Versatile use of microliths as a technological advantage in the miniaturization of Late Pleistocene toolkits: The case study of Neve David, Israel.

Iris Groman-Yaroslavski, Hong Chen, Cheng Liu, Ron Shimelmitz, Reuven Yeshurun, Jiying Liu, Xia Yang, Dani Nadel

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iris Groman-YaroslavskiZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5102-3163
Hong ChenDepartment of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Cheng LiuZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1950-7376
Ron ShimelmitzZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.
Reuven YeshurunZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.
Jiying LiuZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.
Xia YangInstitute of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Dani NadelZinman Institute of Archaeology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The miniaturization of stone tools, as reflected through the systematic production of bladelets and bladelet tools (microliths), characterized many industries of the Late Pleistocene, with the Levantine Epipalaeolithic serving as a well-studied example. It is commonly held that microliths were used as modular inserts in composite projectiles, while their incorporation in other tools for different tasks is generally overlooked, the latter aspect being the main focus of this paper. We present here a more inclusive approach through a case study of the Geometric Kebaran (Middle Epipalaeolithic, ca. 18,500-15,000 cal BP) site of Neve David, Mount Carmel, Israel. Recent excavations at the site exposed a variety of features, and one well-preserved shallow pit provided a large lithic assemblage with ca. 90 microliths. We studied this assemblage using both the low- and high- magnification use-wear protocols, accompanied by a range of experiments. Our results show that a) the fragmentation rate is very high in this assemblage (ca. 90%), b) most of the microliths have identifiable use-wear, c) the microliths were commonly used as inserts in composite projectiles, d) many microliths were used for functions not related to weaponry and hunting, such as wood-working, weed harvesting and meat processing. These findings strongly support the suggestion that the small insets, regardless of their specific type (trapeze, rectangle, backed/retouched bladelet), were used in a wide variety of composite tools. We argue that such a versatile approach and flexibility in the use of microliths reflect a technological advantage where a minimal set of microlithic types, produced in large numbers, could provide the required elements for weapons, as well as for a variety of cutting, processing and harvesting tools needed for mundane tasks at a large Middle Epipalaeolithic camp.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyEquipment DesignGeological PhenomenaHistory, AncientHumansIndustryIsraelMiniaturizationTechnologyWeapons

Identifiers

PMID32492038
PMCPMC7269238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.