Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32492021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Cecal microbiome composition and metabolic function in probiotic treated broilers.

Denise R Rodrigues, Whitney Briggs, Audrey Duff, Kaylin Chasser, Raj Murugesan, Chasity Pender, Shelby Ramirez, Luis Valenzuela, Lisa Bielke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Dietary High-Yield ProteaseAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Examining the effects ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  12. Effect of DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential application of the probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Ileal and cecal microbiota response toFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Co-fermented yellow wine lees byFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise R RodriguesDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-5514
Whitney BriggsDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Audrey DuffDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Kaylin ChasserDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Raj MurugesanBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, Kansas, United States of America.
Chasity PenderBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, Kansas, United States of America.
Shelby RamirezBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, Kansas, United States of America.
Luis ValenzuelaBIOMIN Holding GmbH, Getzersdorf, Austria.
Lisa BielkeDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have become increasingly popular in the poultry industry as a promising nutritional intervention to promote the modulation of intestinal microbial communities and their metabolic activities as a means of improving health and performance. This study aimed to determine the influence of different probiotic formulations on the taxonomic and metabolic profiling of cecal microbial communities, as well as to define associations between cecal microbiota and growth parameters in 21 and 42-day-old broilers. Probiotics investigated included a synbiotic (SYNBIO), a yeast-based probiotic (YEAST), and three single-strain formulations of spore-forming Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (SINGLE1), B. subtilis (SINGLE2) and B. licheniformis (SINGLE3). Dietary inclusion of SYNBIO, YEAST, SINGLE2, and SINGLE3 into the diets supported a significant stimulation of BW and BWG by 7 days of age. Besides, SYNBIO reduced the overall mortality rate by 42d (p<0.05). No significant variation was observed among different probiotic-based formulations for cecal microbiota composition. However, there was a treatment-specific effect on the metabolic profiles, with a particular beneficial metabolic adaptation by the microbiota when supplemented by SYNBIO and SINGLE2. Furthermore, the population of Lactobacillales was identified to be strongly associated with lower Enterobacteriales colonization, higher BW means, and lower mortality rate of growing broilers. Overall, the results emphasize that probiotic supplementation may enhance the microbial energy metabolism in the ceca of young broilers.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsCecumMaleMicrobiotaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID32492021
PMCPMC7269258
OpenAlexW3028633503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.