Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32491097›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2020

A historical review of the techniques of recovery of parasites for their detection in human stools.

Felipe Augusto Soares, Aline do Nascimento Benitez, Bianca Martins Dos Santos, Saulo Hudson Nery Loiola, Stefany Laryssa Rosa, Walter Bertequini Nagata, Sandra Valéria Inácio, Celso Tetsuo Nagase Suzuki, Katia Denise Saraiva Bresciani, Alexandre Xavier Falcão and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High Prevalence and Regional Heterogeneity of CanineAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Comparison of wet mount, Mini-FLOTAC and Midi Parasep® coprological techniques for the detection ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stool Parasitological Examination: A Diagnostic Methodology Under Threat of Extinction.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Food Allergies and Parasites in Children.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felipe Augusto SoaresFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Aline do Nascimento BenitezFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Bianca Martins Dos SantosFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Saulo Hudson Nery LoiolaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Stefany Laryssa RosaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Walter Bertequini NagataDepartamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.
Sandra Valéria InácioDepartamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.
Celso Tetsuo Nagase SuzukiImmunocamp Ciência e Tecnologia, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Katia Denise Saraiva BrescianiDepartamento de Apoio, Produção e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araçatuba, SP, Brasil.
Alexandre Xavier FalcãoInstituto de Computação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Jancarlo Ferreira GomesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRMinistério da Ciência e Tecnologia · AO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early 20th century, the detection of intestinal parasites has improved with the development of several techniques for parasitic structures recovery and identification, which differ in sensitivity, specificity, practicality, cost, and infrastructure demand. This study aims to review, in chronological order, the stool examination techniques and discuss their advantages, limitations, and perspectives, and to provide professionals and specialists in this field with data that lays a foundation for critical analysis on the use of such procedures. The concentration procedures that constitute the main techniques applied in routine research and in parasitological kits are a) spontaneous sedimentation; b) centrifugation-sedimentation with formalin-ethyl acetate; and c) flotation with zinc sulfate solution. While selecting a technique, one should consider the purpose of its application and the technical-operational, biological, and physicochemical factors inherent in the procedures used in stool processing, which may restrict its use. These intrinsic limitations may have undergone procedural changes driven by scientific and technological development and by development of alternative methods, which now contribute to the improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

AnimalsFecesHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticParasitologySensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID32491097
PMCPMC7269538
OpenAlexW3029125239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.