Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32491093›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2020

Brazilian cohorts with potential for life-course studies: a scoping review.

Waleska Regina Machado Araujo, Iná S Santos, Naercio Aquino Menezes Filho, Maria Thereza Costa Coelho de Souza, Antonio Jose Ledo Alves da Cunha, Alicia Matijasevich

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Determinants of obesity in Latin America.Nature metabolism · 2024 · on this map
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exposome and Social Vulnerability: An Overview of the Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Waleska Regina Machado AraujoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-5758-7947
Iná S SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Pediatria e Saúde da Criança, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1258-9249
Naercio Aquino Menezes FilhoDepartamento de Economia., Faculdade de Economia e Administração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-6188
Maria Thereza Costa Coelho de SouzaDepartamento de Psicologia da aprendizagem, do desenvolvimento e da personalidade, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-0864
Antonio Jose Ledo Alves da CunhaDepartamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-1849
Alicia MatijasevichDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0060-1589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify the Brazilian cohorts that started either in the prenatal period or at birth, to describe their characteristics and the explored variables, and to map the cohorts with potential for studies on early determinants on health and the risk of falling ill on later stages of the life cycle. METHODS A scoping review was carried out. The articles were searched in the electronic databases PubMed and Virtual Health Library (VHL). The descriptors used were [((("Child" OR "Child, Preschool" OR "Infant" OR "Infant, Newborn") AND (Cohort Studies" OR "Longitudinal Studies")) AND "Brazil")]. The inclusion criteria were Brazilian cohorts that started the baseline in the prenatal period or at birth and with at least two follow-ups with the participants. In order to meet the concept of LCE, we excluded those cohorts whose follow-ups were restricted to the first year of life, as well as those that did not address biological, behavioral and psychosocial aspects, and cohorts with data collection of a single stage of the life cycle. RESULTS The search step identified 5,010 articles. Eighteen cohorts were selected for descriptive synthesis. The median number of baseline participants was 2,000 individuals and the median age at the last follow-up was 9 years. Sample loss at the last follow-up ranged from 9.2 to 87.5%. Most cohorts monitored two phases of the life cycle (the perinatal period and childhood). The Southern region had the highest number of cohorts. The main variables collected were sociodemographic and environmental aspects of the family, morbidity aspects, nutritional practices and lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS We recommend the continuity of these cohorts, the approach to different social contexts and the performance of follow-ups with participants in different phases of the life cycle for the strengthening and expansion of life course epidemiology analyses in Brazil.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesAge FactorsBrazilChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolEpidemiologic Research DesignFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLife Cycle StagesMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32491093
PMCPMC7234216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.