Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32490972›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia2020

COVID-19 and the eye: how much do we really know? A best evidence review.

Juan Pablo Olivares-de Emparan, Carolina Sardi-Correa, Juan Alberto López-Ulloa, Jaime Viteri-Soria, Jason A Penniecook, Jesús Jimenez-Román, Van C Lansingh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SARS-CoV-2 and the ocular surface: test accuracy and viral load.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan Pablo Olivares-de EmparanAsociación para evitar la ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carolina Sardi-CorreaInstituto Nacional de Investigación en Oftalmología, Medellin, Colombia
Juan Alberto López-UlloaCentro Mexicano de Salud Visual Preventiva, Mexico City, Mexico
Jaime Viteri-SoriaUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Jason A PenniecookCentro Mexicano de Salud Visual Preventiva, Mexico City, Mexico
Jesús Jimenez-RománAsociación para evitar la ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Van C LansinghCentro Mexicano de Salud Visual Preventiva, Mexico City, MexicoORCID 0000-0002-0090-4195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify and classify available information regarding COVID-19 and eye care according to the level of evidence, within four main topics of interest: evidence of the virus in tears and the ocular surface, infection via the conjunctival route, ocular manifestations, and best practice recommendations. A structured review was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar on COVID-19 and ophthalmology. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence worksheet was used for quality assessments. 1018 items were identified in the search; 26 records were included in the qualitative synthesis, which encompassed 6 literature reviews, 10 case series or cross-sectional studies, 4 case reports, and 6 intervention descriptions. Seventeen out of 26 records (65%) were categorized as level 5 within the Oxford CBME methodology grading system, the rest were level 4. The evidence generated on COVID-19 and ophthalmology to date is limited, although this is understandable given the circumstances. Both the possible presence of viral particles in tears and conjunctiva, and the potential for conjunctival transmission remain controversial. Ocular manifestations are not frequent and could resemble viral infection of the ocular surface. Most recommendations are based on the strategies implemented by Asian countries during previous coronavirus outbreaks. There is a need for substantive studies evaluating these strategies in the setting of SARS-CoV-2. In the meantime, plans for applying these measures must be implemented with caution, taking into account the context of each individual country, and undergo regular evaluation.

Indexed as

ConjunctivaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Evidence-Based MedicineEye DiseasesHumansOphthalmologyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReview Literature as TopicTears

Identifiers

PMID32490972
PMCPMC11826647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.