ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2020
Different approaches to the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion during growth: Bionator versus extraoral appliance.
Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Trial
- The Fixed Functional Appliances in Class II Malocclusion: A Clinical Performance Comparison.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- The Therapeutic Approaches Dealing with Malocclusion Type III-Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Changes in health-related quality of life after orthognathic surgery: a multicenter study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- About gladiators and a sacred disease.Biomedical journal · 2022Article
- Mandibular orthopedic advancement in different facial patterns and distinct stages of skeletal maturation.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2021Article
- Importance of orthodontic intervention of the Class III malocclusion in mixed dentition.Dental press journal of orthodonticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClass II malocclusion, which has a significant incidence in the population, may compromise facial esthetics and the smile, as well as the masticatory and respiratory functions. Often associated with skeletal abnormalities, it severely affects and compromises quality of life. An accurate diagnosis is fundamental to prepare a treatment plan to correct dental and skeletal anomalies.
objectivesThis study discusses treatment alternatives to the correction of Class II division 1 and 2 malocclusion in growing patients, using a Bionator and an extraoral appliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.