Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32490840›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2020

Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing-Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design.

Stephan Wegner, Quentin Lohmeyer, Dimitri Wahlen, Sandra Neumann, Jean-Claude Groebli, Mirko Meboldt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephan WegnerProduct Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1345-6395
Quentin LohmeyerProduct Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-5329
Dimitri WahlenProduct Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-9597
Sandra NeumannPeripal AG, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-9787
Jean-Claude GroebliPeripal AG, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9953-922X
Mirko MeboldtProduct Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-5406
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to give a wide range of people the opportunity to ensure and support home care, one approach is to develop medical devices that are as user-friendly as possible. This allows nonexperts to use medical devices that were originally too complicated to use. For a user-centric development of such medical devices, it is essential to understand which user interface design best supports patients, caregivers, and health care professionals.

objectiveUsing the benefits of mobile eye tracking, this work aims to gain a deeper understanding of the challenges of user cognition. As a consequence, its goal is to identify the obstacles to the usability of the features of two different designs of a single medical device user interface. The medical device is a patient assistance device for home use in peritoneal dialysis therapy.

methodsA total of 16 participants, with a subset of seniors (8/16, mean age 73.7 years) and young adults (8/16, mean age 25.0 years), were recruited and participated in this study. The handling cycle consisted of seven main tasks. Data analysis started with the analysis of task effectiveness for searching for error-related tasks. Subsequently, the in-depth gaze data analysis focused on these identified critical tasks. In order to understand the challenges of user cognition in critical tasks, gaze data were analyzed with respect to individual user interface features of the medical device system. Therefore, it focused on the two dimensions of dwell time and fixation duration of the gaze.

resultsIn total, 97% of the handling steps for design 1 and 96% for design 2 were performed correctly, with the main challenges being task 1 insert, task 2 connect, and task 6 disconnect for both designs. In order to understand the two analyzed dimensions of the physiological measurements simultaneously, the authors propose a new graphical representation. It distinguishes four different patterns to compare the eye movements associated with the two designs. The patterns identified for the critical tasks are consistent with the results of the task performance.

conclusionsThis study showed that mobile eye tracking provides insights into information processing in intensive handling tasks related to individual user interface features. The evaluation of each feature of the user interface promises an optimal design by combining the best found features. In this way, manufacturers are able to develop products that can be used by untrained people without prior knowledge. This would allow home care to be provided not only by highly qualified nurses and caregivers, but also by patients themselves, partners, children, or neighbors.

Indexed as

benchmarkinghome carehuman factors engineeringmobile eye trackingquantitative evaluationquantitative researchself-managementusability

Identifiers

PMID32490840
PMCPMC7301256
OpenAlexW3013706699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.